The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Feds asked to probe Google's leaky search terms

Sharing, but not caring

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

The FTC is considering a complaint that Google conceals the fact that users' search terms are handed over to the websites they visit.

Christopher Soghoian, a well-known privacy campaigner and former FTC employee, charges that the dominant search engine's privacy policy does not explain that referral headers - which include full search terms - are routinely shared.

"If Google wants to share its users' search query data with third parties, there is nothing I can do to stop it," he wrote.

"However, the company should not be permitted to lie about its practices. If it wants to share its customers' search queries with third parties, it should disclose that it is doing so. Even more so, it shouldn't be able to loudly, and falsely proclaim that it is protecting its users' search data."

The complaint cites Google's opposition to a Department of Justice subpoena for two months' search records in 2006.

"Google users trust that when they enter a search query into a Google search box, not only will they receive back the most relevant results, but that Google will keep private whatever information users communicate absent a compelling reason," the firm claimed to court.

Soghoian wants the FTC to force Google to tell users it is sharing their search terms. It should delete existing data, he said, and do a better job of marketing its alternative encrypted search service, which does not pass on referrer headers.

Google told the Wall Street Journal that its referrer header policy follows "standard practice across all search engines".

"Google does not pass any personal information about the source of the query to the destination website," it added.

Soghoian points out that in 2006, Google took a different view over whether search terms are personal data.

"Search query content can disclose identities and personally identifiable information such as user‐initiated searches for their own social security or credit card numbers, or their mistakenly pasted but revealing text," the firm told the court in its dispute with the DoJ.

Soghoian's complaint is here (pdf). ®

What you need to know about cloud backup

And his point is?

Who is going to be going through referer (sic) headers for PI when there is a million other ways to get more and better info.

I think this guy works for a specially trained Google squad who raise spurious non-issues to distract people while Google nip round the back and nick all your spoons.

3
0

Twat

As others have said, it isn't Google it's the browser.

OK, Google could use POST rather than GET so that the search term wouldn't appear in the URI.

Perhaps someone should warn this guy that every site he clicks a link on tells the new site where he came from. In his world, that must constitute stalking!!!!

What an annoying, attention grabbing tit

3
0

No...

Google isn't doing it. Your browser sends a referrer header to the target site. This is true for all websites. Silly humans.

4
1

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
NSA: We COULD track you by your phone ... if we WANTED to
Honestly, too much work, can't be bothered