The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Nortel flogs switch biz to Ericsson

Swedes stump up $65m

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

Nortel has sold its multi-service switching business to Ericsson for $65m.

The deal, which will need approval from the bankruptcy courts, gives Ericsson most of the MMS business, along with Data Packet Network and Services Edge Router products and associated intellectual property.

Customer contracts and most staff will also transfer to the new owners.

Nortel said it would work hard to ensure a seamless transition for customers and maintain the high service the company is known for.

Ericsson paid $1.13bn for Nortel's CDMA and LTE Access business in 2009.

The company said shareholders should not expect any benefit from the deal.

Nortel slid into Chapter 11 in January 2009. The Canadian giant, which had been around over 100 years, had never really recovered from the effects of the dot com crash in the early 2000s.

Nortel's full sale statement is here. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Nortel has sold its multi-service switching business to Ericsson for $65m.

This is less than one of their big switches in downtown Toronto.

Another page of history in the garbage.

2
0

fire sale

I wonder, if by waiting so long to get it cheap, that the MSS/Passport biz is possibly worth _less_ than what Ericsson paid; since I don't think many of Nortel's customers would have stuck around since chapter 11 started. Maybe they can mark it down on the accounts under corporate charity.

It's a long time since Bay Networks was a major player in what has become Cisco's world.

flames for obvious reasons.

0
0

Clueless

It didn't help that their mobile phone switch division was clueless to networking albeit they had purchased Bay networks. They required RIP routing because they had a gateway address and then the back-end IP. They never could explain why they built it that way and why they thought it was a great idea to require a routing protocol to interface as a device on a network. The worst part was they supported two Ethernet standards. One allowed local access (you had to be on the same subnet) and the other allowed remote access (local access no longer worked). While there were two Ethernet standards, the industry have already standardized on one. Basically Nortel was clueless in networking and never used their in-house capabilities but rather let their customers deal with it. Oh, that wonderful above product, could only handle 2 Mbps. Forget about management, the call records ate up most of that.

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches