Feeds

Saatchis to pimp .xxx domains

The old net porn system isn't w**king

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Renowned advertising agency M&C Saatchi is to take on the porn business, after agreeing to represent the proposed .xxx domain name operator, ICM Registry.

The company is expected to launch a two-phase campaign, the first designed to help sell the purported benefits of the domain to a recalcitrant porn industry, the second to flog the names to punters after the registry launches.

M&C Saatchi was founded by Saatchi brothers Maurice and Charles, who first found fame with their "Labour Isn't Working" campaign, credited with helping Margaret Thatcher into office in 1979.

The .xxx domain has not yet been, and may never be, approved. It's currently going through an ICANN process that is likely to lead to its delegation early next year, but is subject to a vociferous campaign for its rejection led by US porn trade group the Free Speech Coalition.

The FSC believes the domain is little more that a cash grab, unwanted by the majority of porn sites, that creates a real risk of government censorship. Saatchi will be initially tasked with attempting to make these pornographers less hostile.

Saatchi's .xxx campaigns are not expected to be particularly salacious. ICM is positioning the domain as a place for "responsible" pornographers, who agree to abide by certain rules on content and security.

The Register has learned that ICM is also planning to sweeten its proposition to the porn business by creating about a dozen free-to-list porn directory sites on "super-premium" domain names.

Rather than auction off, for example, porn.xxx or sex.xxx to the highest bidder, the company instead plans to create directory sites there and allow any .xxx web site operator to freely list their URL.

We understand that these directories will not take advertising, will only accept listings from developed sites, and that listed sites will be displayed in random rotation.

The hope is that many .xxx registrants will be able to recoup the costs of their pricey registration fee, expected to be well over $60 a year, through traffic sent to them by these premium directory sites.

ICM has taken roughly 180,000 pre-registrations over the last few years. The FSC believes many of these are defensive registrations made by pornographers who would prefer .xxx is never approved, which ICM disputes.

ICANN is currently soliciting public comments on ICM's proposed registry contracts. The deadline for comments to be submitted is today. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
Surprise: if you work from home you need the Internet
Buffer-rage sends Aussies out to experience road rage
EE buys 58 Phones 4u stores for £2.5m after picking over carcass
Operator says it will safeguard 359 jobs, plans lick of paint
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.