Feeds

Microsoft's man in Nokia: he's all business

Ballmer's remit expands

The essential guide to IT transformation

Developers, developers, developers

Driving the phones have been developers, who've been building apps consumers want. Developers have been genuinely excited by the iPhone for being "cool" - despite being closed - and Android for having open code and being available on multiple devices. Symbian lacks any excitement despite making more sense in terms of serving a larger addressable market.

Hard decisions will need to be taken as a result of the industry shift to software and services around phones.

The toughest decision will be what to do with Symbian. Under outgoing Nokia CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, Nokia placed all its bets on Symbian by buying out other consortium partners and open sourcing the Symbian code in the belief if you release it they will come.

But Symbian has done nothing but lose market share, and as it sinks, it takes Nokia's handsets with it.

Symbian is an underfunded adjunct to the main Nokia mothership. The company's low-balled efforts to woo developers, in the mistaken belief coders will simply love the code for being open source.

It's time to either pour money into Symbian's industry and developer outreach or cut Nokia's losses and jump on a platform with growth - or at least the potential for growth.

A more insidious problem has been Nokia's tribal corporate culture. This must be overcome if Nokia is to branch out beyond building handsets.

An example of the tribalism burst out in 2009, when the disgruntled Maemo group tried to sabotage the chosen child Symbian by telling the press that Nokia was dropping Symbian for Maemo.

On a more day-to-day basis, there are structural problems. Handset and Ovi staff are both remunerated by the apps people run on their Nokia handsets – apps like Facebook.

Problem is, Ovi wants Facebook downloaded to phones from the store, while the handset people want Facebook pre-installed. Ovi won, despite a lack of traffic to its store.

Maybe in hiring a former Microsoft executive, Nokia's board hopes to solve some of these issues – at least the software and services questions.

Microsoft and Nokia have had a spasmodic relationship over the years: agreeing to put Microsoft's Flash challenger Silverlight on certain devices, for example, but not others.

It's possible Nokia's hire hints at where it really wants to go: into a closer partnership with Microsoft. Elop's team has been working with the faltering cell-phone giant to put Microsoft software like Office Mobile and Communicator on its Symbian smart phones.

Our man in Nokia

In a Machiavellian world, Elop could be Microsoft's man inside telecoms. Finally, an army of devices for Windows Phone 7, with phones hooked into its Windows Phone marketplace. Despite slipping, Nokia remains the world's largest supplier of cell phones.

While that theory has potential, new leaders of companies are rarely stooges for their past bosses. Paul Mauritz, for example, has turned into a tough adversary for Microsoft at VMware despite helping build Office and SQL Server and different versions of Windows over the years.

Past is prologue, according to vice president Joe Biden during the 2008 US presidential election. If so, then Nokia future success against the iPhone and Android is far from clear based on its new CEO's experience.

At Microsoft, Elop's exit leaves Steve Ballmer with an even bigger succession crisis than before. Two of Microsoft's five product groups are now being run directly by Ballmer. The president of entertainment and devices Robbie Bach announced this summer he's leaving Microsoft. Entertainment and devices is home to Windows Phone 7.

Ballmer is now running both groups, presumably until he finds full-time replacements. Where those replacements come from, though, is unclear.

Like Nokia, Microsoft could use a little consumer mojo on phones, as Gartner also predicted Friday Windows Phone will continue to lose market share.

By 2014, Gartner expects open-source platforms will account for more than 60 per cent of the market for all smart phones. Microsoft will be relegated from fifth to sixth place behind Linux newcomer MeeGo from Nokia and Intel, making this October's highly anticipated Windows Phone 7 launch a sideshow to the march of history.

On business applications Microsoft could use somebody with a real foot in the clouds, to convince people it's serious about online services and not simply happy relying on the existing Office and SharePoint franchises as money makers. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft boots 1,500 dodgy apps from the Windows Store
DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! Naughty, misleading developers!
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Linux turns 23 and Linus Torvalds celebrates as only he can
No, not with swearing, but by controlling the release cycle
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.