Feeds

Adobe exploit bears fingerprints of hack on Google

New in-the-wild attacks unearthed

The essential guide to IT transformation

Recent attacks that exploit an unpatched vulnerability in Adobe's near-ubiquitous Reader application bear the hallmarks of the people who breached Google and dozens of other large companies earlier this year, researchers from Symantec said.

The booby-trapped PDF files are attached to emails that request interviews and offer expert commentary on matters involving North Korea and China, according to Symantec's Karthik Selvaraj. They began circulating as early as September 1 and contain similarities to emails that contained the Hydraq trojan that was used to penetrate Google, Adobe Systems and at least 32 other companies. Parallels include wording in the email, multiple variants of the PDF, and the same geographic region of one of the people responsible.

“If the above emails look familiar, it is because their style is very similar to the emails used in Hydraq (Aurora) attacks,” Selvaraj wrote here. “In addition, the use of a zero-day within a PDF, and how the executable is dropped on the system, all match the Hydraq method of operation. Furthermore, we have seen a large number of detections of unique versions of the PDF – not yet seen elsewhere in the wild – coming from a single computer in Shandong Province of China, which is how far back investigators were able to trace the Hydraq attacks.”

Adobe disclosed the zero-day vulnerability last week and warned that it was being actively exploited on the internet to attack users of its Reader application. In addition to bypassing protections built in to more recent versions of Microsoft Windows, the sophisticated exploit also used a stolen digital certificate belonging to Missouri-based Vantage Credit Union, evidently in an attempt to allay suspicions of prospective victims.

Adobe's security team has yet to say when it expects to release a patch. In the meantime, users who don't want to use an alternate PDF application can employ Microsoft's Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit, or EMET, to block attacks. The tool, which was updated earlier this month, will insulate a Reader module that's targeted in the exploit, Adobe said.

Microsoft provides instructions and screenshots here. ®

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
e-Borders fiasco: Brits stung for £224m after US IT giant sues UK govt
Defeat to Raytheon branded 'catastrophic result'
Germany 'accidentally' snooped on John Kerry and Hillary Clinton
Dragnet surveillance picks up EVERYTHING, USA, m'kay?
Snowden on NSA's MonsterMind TERROR: It may trigger cyberwar
Plus: Syria's internet going down? That was a US cock-up
Who needs hackers? 'Password1' opens a third of all biz doors
GPU-powered pen test yields more bad news about defences and passwords
Think crypto hides you from spooks on Facebook? THINK AGAIN
Traffic fingerprints reveal all, say boffins
Rupert Murdoch says Google is worse than the NSA
Mr Burns vs. The Chocolate Factory, round three!
Microsoft cries UNINSTALL in the wake of Blue Screens of Death™
Cache crash causes contained choloric calamity
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.