Feeds

SEC doesn't do a Moody

Credit rating allegations? Not our job

Eight steps to building an HP BladeSystem

The Securities and Exchange Commission is dropping an investigation into alleged fraudulent behaviour at ratings agency Moody's because it is not sure if it has legal jurisdiction over the company.

Moody's was accused of awarding wrongly high ratings to various constant proportion debt obligation notes - the infamous structured debt products which turned out to be not much more than bundles of dodgy US mortgages re-packaged to look like they were almost risk-free.

The SEC said: "Because of uncertainty regarding a jurisdictional nexus between the United States and the relevant ratings conduct, the Commission declined to pursue a fraud enforcement action in this matter."

The problem came to light when the FT got hold of internal documents showing Moody's had been aware it had been wrongly awarding AAA ratings.

The SEC Report of Investigation said that Moody's discovered in early 2007 that it was ramping up ratings by 1.5 to 3.5 notches. But the company decided not to take any action because it didn't want to damage its own reputation. Moody's at the time blamed a computer error.

The SEC said it was warning ratings agencies of the importance of proper internal procedures and controls to stop them issuing incorrect ratings.

The regulator said: “It is crucial that nationally recognized statistical rating organizations take steps to assure themselves of the accuracy of those statements and that they have in place sufficient internal controls over the procedures they use to determine credit ratings.”

The SEC said new security laws meant it would have no problem taking action against a firm in future for failing to follow a proper methodology for setting ratings. It warned it would take anti-fraud action against companies within the US or whose actions would have an impact within the US.

Moody's issues ratings for all sorts of financial instruments including company bonds and even countries' sovereign debt. Some investors, like pension funds, can only invest in products with high, AAA ratings. ®

Mobile application security vulnerability report

More from The Register

next story
BBC goes offline in MASSIVE COCKUP: Stephen Fry partly muzzled
Auntie tight-lipped as major outage rolls on
iPad? More like iFAD: We reveal why Apple fell into IBM's arms
But never fear fanbois, you're still lapping up iPhones, Macs
White? Male? You work in tech? Let us guess ... Twitter? We KNEW it!
Grim diversity numbers dumped alongside Facebook earnings
HP, Microsoft prove it again: Big Business doesn't create jobs
SMEs get lip service - what they need is dinner at the Club
Bose says today IS F*** With Dre Day: Beats sued in patent battle
Music gear giant seeks some of that sweet, sweet Apple pie
Amazon Reveals One Weird Trick: A Loss On Almost $20bn In Sales
Investors really hate it: Share price plunge as growth SLOWS in key AWS division
Dude, you're getting a Dell – with BITCOIN: IT giant slurps cryptocash
1. Buy PC with Bitcoin. 2. Mine more coins. 3. Goto step 1
There's NOTHING on TV in Europe – American video DOMINATES
Even France's mega subsidies don't stop US content onslaught
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.