Feeds

Every cloud has a platinum lining

Says 3PAR CEO

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Conversations with various people suggest that 3PAR is keen to rebut any suggestion it has been shopping itself.

The background to the HP and Dell bid battle is that 3PAR was exploring ways to increase its addressable market with channel arrangements such as a potential reseller deal with Dell, and also a potential supply deal with a vendor that had recently terminated a high-end storage array supply deal, thought to be Oracle.

None of these had come to fruition when the first and unsolicited bid was received from HP. At that time two other companies had expressed interest in some sort of deal going beyond a reseller or OEM supply arrangement. It was at this time that 3PAR's management decided it had better take an active role going forward instead of remaining passive.

The focus changed from expanding its routes to market itself, 3PAR recognising it needed to gain more customers to grow, to possibly expanding its routes to market by using those of an acquiring company.

A financial advisor was hired, Qatalyst, and the rest is history, with 3PAR now valued at $2 billion by the $30/share HP bid, and Dell's response awaited.

Another aspect to 3PAR's apparently sky-high valuation is that it has a refresh of the ASIC chip at the heart of its InServ arrays coming; the last roll of the ASIC being in July 2008, and rolls typically coming in 3-year intervals.

It may be that extra functionality will be added, such as compression, to include storage efficiency even further. It is also understood to be likely that 3PAR will start the process of adding a way of federating InServe arrays in a peer-level, self-governing, autonomic system that limits customers failure domains to a single InServ but enables multiple InServes to provide a single and shared pool of storage.

David Scott, 3PAR's CEO, differentiates this style of storage federation from that created by adding a layer of appliances above the storage arrays, such as EMC is espousing with VPLEX. That method adds complexity, means there is more to go wrong and enlarges the system failure domain.

A set of federating InServ arrays could be powerfully attractive to cloud storage providers looking for scalability, cost-effectiveness and lower management costs.

Referring to the bidding process, Scott said he might alter what his grandmother told him, and say: "Every cloud has a platinum lining." ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Lenovo to finish $2.1bn IBM x86 server gobble in October
A lighter snack than expected – but what's a few $100m between friends, eh?
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.