Feeds

Previous HP bid for 3PAR rejected

HP goes hostile

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

In a webcast discussing HP's bid for 3PAR today, HP said it had made a previous offer for the company which had, instead, accepted a Dell offer.

HP's David Donatelli, head of its Enterprise Servers, Storage and Networks division, said that HP had run due diligence on 3PAR before any publicity about a 3PAR acquisition and that there was an HP offer on the table when the Dell bid was agreed.

This means that 3PAR's leadership rejected it, preferring the Dell bid and, indeed, agreeing the Dell bid. By the point that 3PAR agreed to go with Dell any further HP bid must have been sought and not found, HP refusing to modify its then outstanding offer, or not been sought.

In either case 3PAR effectively rejected HP. Now HP has come back with a public offer, more or less telling the 3PAR board to think again. It's letter stated: "We propose to increase our offer to acquire all of 3PAR outstanding common stock to $24.00 per share in cash," indicating that, at first glance, the outstanding offer was for less than Dell's $18/share. But suppose that was not the case.

Our thinking is that Dell promised 3PAR arms-length management as a more or less independent entity inside Dell, similar to the acquired EqualLogic operation. Both Dell and 3PAR were happy with the bid.

Donatelli said in the webcast that 3PAR was an excellent fit with HP, being located nearby in Silicon Valley, and that it could quickly be integrated and grow inside HP. He would not answer a question about how3PAR would be managed inside HP, saying it was too soon to say.

Our reading of this is that 3PAR inside HP would be surrounded by a close HP embrace and not run as a semi-independent entity like EqualLogic.

It looks from here as if HP has made a hostile and unwanted bid for 3PAR and that 3PAR will be quite anxious for a re-bid from Dell to take place, although, in their heart of hearts it must fear that Donatelli's pockets are deeper than Michael Dell's. ®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
NSA SOURCE CODE LEAK: Information slurp tools to appear online
Now you can run your own intelligence agency
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Stop the IoT revolution! We need to figure out packet sizes first
Researchers test 802.15.4 and find we know nuh-think! about large scale sensor network ops
SanDisk vows: We'll have a 16TB SSD WHOPPER by 2016
Flash WORM has a serious use for archived photos and videos
Astro-boffins start opening universe simulation data
Got a supercomputer? Want to simulate a universe? Here you go
Microsoft adds video offering to Office 365. Oh NOES, you'll need Adobe Flash
Lovely presentations... but not on your Flash-hating mobe
prev story

Whitepapers

Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
Why CIOs should rethink endpoint data protection in the age of mobility
Assessing trends in data protection, specifically with respect to mobile devices, BYOD, and remote employees.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Protecting against web application threats using SSL
SSL encryption can protect server‐to‐server communications, client devices, cloud resources, and other endpoints in order to help prevent the risk of data loss and losing customer trust.