Feeds

Quantum quivers again

Drops a sales ball

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Quantum, the supplier of tape, reduplicating backup arrays and some file archiving software, has turned in a loss-making quarter, attributing it to poor sales in Europe and a North America region.

Quantum's results for its first fiscal 2011 quarter saw revenues $3m upon the year-ago quarter to $163m, essentially flat as the increase was just 2 per cent. This was not according to plan; only 60 per cent of the sales plan was achieved in EMEA and one North American sales region saw a 30 per cent plan achievement. It is a near-derisory sales performance in these two areas and seems to have been associated with tape products, as well as a decline in DXI6500 sales in EMEA.

The company made a net loss of $3m, compared to a net profit a year ago of $5m. So, despite a $3m sales rise, there was a $3m loss. It basically spent more than it earned because sales flopped. This is particularly annoying following on from the good business performance in its fiscal 2010.

Quantum increased its operating expenses, inline with an expected level of sales. CFO and COO Jon Gacek said in the earnings call transcript: "The largest driver of the increase in operating expenses was an increase in marketing and sales expenses primarily related to advertising and marketing programs for our new products and increases in sales headcount and the associated costs."

The company increased its sales head-count and under-performed in sales. Great management.

Quantum's SVP for world-wide sales, Eric Brodersen took a hike in June, as it happened before it became known that lousy sales in EMEA and a North American region would drag the company's quarterly results into loss.

He might well have been made to walk the plank for the poor sales execution. Instead he went before such a push and is now SVP for marketing and business development at Isilon. Quantum needs a new world-wide sales boss as a result.

Belluzzo and his team are hoping that with a lower level of debt repayment, more consistent sales execution and better DXi and StoreNext sales, Quantum will make a profit again in fiscal 2011 and continue to do so. That would be a terrific result for their dogged and determined work over the past few years.

And they could then ask themselves the question: "What next?" Should Quantum make an acquisition to buy its way into a market segment with healthier long-term growth prospects than the DXi business, which is seeing much increased competition from HP, Dell and others? Now there's a question. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Lenovo to finish $2.1bn IBM x86 server gobble in October
A lighter snack than expected – but what's a few $100m between friends, eh?
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Troll hunter Rackspace turns Rotatable's bizarro patent to stone
News of the Weird: Screen-rotating technology declared unpatentable
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.