The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple fanbois not as data hungry as Big Phone says

Verizonites munch more

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

When AT&T's wireless service buckles and chokes, defenders say that Big Phone's infrastructure is being overloaded by iPhone users — but a new study shows that Jobsian handheld owners' data hunger is handily eclipsed by that of users of Verizon data plans.

Average monthly data dining for Verizon smartphones is 421MB, versus only 338MB for iPhones, according to a study being conducted by the phone-bill watchers at Validas of Houston, Texas.

"The key detail in this study that drives the average," said Validas EVP for analytics Ed Finegold, "is that, by percentage, nearly twice as many Verizon Wireless smartphone users are consuming 500 megabytes to 1 gigabyte per month compared to AT&T iPhone users."

Finegold cautions, however, that: "Averages can be misleading because when you plot data users in a distribution, you quickly see that there is no typical user — they are spread across a broad range."

For example, around 54 per cent of Verizon smartphones and 52 per cent of iPhones use less than 200MB per month, but 46 per cent of Verizon smartphones and 48 per cent of iPhones use use more than 200MB per month. But Verizon leads handily at the higher end, with over 4 per cent of Verizon users eating up more than 2GB per month — a hunger exhibited by a mere 1.6 per cent of iPhones.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, 3.4 per cent of Verizon users and 2.9 per cent of iPhone users don't consume any data whatsoever.

Finegold is right: the "typical user" is a mythical beast.

Validas's data was culled from the consumer wireless bills of over 20,000 smartphone users between January and May of this year. And when Validas says "smartphones", they exclude BlackBerries, which benefit from RIM's data compression — those phones "do not follow similar data consumption patterns to those of iPhones and other Smartphones," says Validas.

Despite less demand on its network, AT&T has faced numerous complaints about its 3G service — so much so that "Fake Steve Jobs" famously faked a fake Operation Chokehold protest last December over Big Phone's spotty service — a prank he quickly cancelled after nearly two thousand of his readers took him seriously.

Another black eye was dealt to AT&T when a "genius" in a New York Apple store told one user last September that he was lucky to see only 22 per cent of his calls being dropped when 30 per cent was the norm — and that user promptly told Gizmodo, which published the Jobsian minion's errant honesty.

The Reg gives credit when credit is due, however, and applauds Big Phone's upgrade efforts: early this year the company announced that it would pop for an additional $2bn to upgrade its network in 2010.

For more information on the Validas study, scheduled for full publication this September, check out their company blog. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Need more data

Since the article only talks about the average amount of data consumed per user, it's possible that AT&T really is buckling under the data load if it has more users than Verizon. We need to know how many smartphone users AT&T has and compare it with how many smartphone users Verizon has before we can say which network is under more strain.

According to linked study, 71.2% of AT&T mobile users have a data plan, while only 42.9% of Verizon users do. The average data per user (regardless of phone type) is comparable between the two networks. It's not such a stretch to imagine that with 30% higher data plan penetration, AT&T serves a lot more data than Verizon does.

2
0

Another consideration is tethering,

since Apple doesn't allow it that would have an affect as well. I'd expect it to see more tethering usage with power users, hence even larger data consumption for the companies that allow it.

1
0

Combat Wombat is correct

Of course there will be less data usage on a crappy network.

Its the symptom of a crap network.... and the symptom of a good network will of course be an increase in data usage.

This study proves Nothing except for the old Churchhillian adage "lies, damned lies and statistics!"

1
0

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
 breaking news
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?