The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Seagate announces ugly diskless NAS filer

Nice price though

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

Seagate has announced an empty four-bay small business filer that you fill up with drives yourself. Seagate ones, naturally.

It's the BlackArmor NAS 400 and is the same box as the NAS 420 and 440 products, which come with two and four drives installed respectively. You can stick 1 and 2TB Barracuda drives in it, but not the 3TB drive used inside the FreeAgent GoFlex - that's simply not available.

In all other respects the NAS 400 is exactly like the NAS 420 and 440 with its four USB and two Gigabit Ethernet ports, DLNA support, RAID 1, 5 and 10 protection, FTP serving etc.

Seagate BlackArmour NAS 400

It looks like them too, having all the style and attractiveness of a desktop shredder - a long way from the colour and elegance of the FreeAgent drives. Lovers of stylish desktop machinery might well cry for Drobo.

There is a heck of a lot of competition in the desktop NAS product space. There's Drobo of course, and Netgear with its ReadyNAS Ultra line-up of two, four, and six-bay products. These were announced earlier this week under a rubric of "the death of local media storage," and include a lot of media-related functionality.

The idea is to store media content on them and share it around networked systems in the home - this not being a small biz box. A diskless four-bay box costs £247.28 ($308.00) on Amazon. A driveless five-bay Drobo file-sharing box costs a lot more: £543.81 ($695.00) on Amazon.

The BlackArmor NAS 400 costs around £270 ($400) and is available now from Seagate's website. Seagate's pricing looks good. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Industrial design

I kind of like the design, looks industrial and solid. Apple's minimalist chic is getting old, and looks like a poor rip-off when other companies do it. I like equipment that wouldn't look out of place in a 1970s NASA control room :)

Also, the cost is because of the limited market for these things - mostly businesses who would prefer to pay $400 for something that just works (and can be returned under warranty if it breaks) than a cobbled together $200 Linux PC that only one staff member understands.

1
0

Indeed

Stick a great big magnifying glass in front of it, and you can pretend it's an AS400.

Now there's stylish.

1
0

Still too much

You can assemble a much better looking system capable of up to 12 drives out of the spare bits bucket and a new case from Maplin for around 150£. 200£ if all parts are new. After that just run FreeNAS on it or plain Linux.

So once again, why should I spend money on this? I am not looking at it unless I see the price fall under what I would pay to DIY.

1
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches