Feeds

ISP condemns new BT backbone

'Simply cannot cope'

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Business ISP Andrews and Arnold has strongly criticised BT's new 21CN network backbone as unable to cope with current bandwidth demands.

The small firm runs a network status blog for its customers, and this morning came out with some harsh words for BT.

"It is quite clear to us that BT's 21CN network simply cannot cope with demand at present," Andrews and Arnold said.

"We have clear evidence of a significant portion (around half) of BT 21CN lines that we have showing serious loss and latency problems within BT."

21CN is a multibillion-pound backbone upgrade that moves all voice and data traffic to a common IP infrastructure. It is being activated nationwide to improve theoretical maximum downstream ADSL speeds to up to 20Mbit/s, from up to 8Mbit/s. In reality the improvement is significantly less, but BT has claimed the upgrade will also make huge savings.

Andres and Arnold gave more details of its gripes.

"The problems are high latency and some packet loss, mostly during the day where there are any high levels of streaming media," it said.

"This has a major effect on the performance of internet access generally and is very serious for anyone using interactive terminal sessions and VoIP. The issues relate to specific BRAS/metro-nodes within BT and so are clearly not our end or the link from us to BT."

The firm challenged BT to make a statement on the problems. This afternoon a spokesman told The Register: "BT's 21CN offers more than adequate capacity, using the latest technologies.

"We offer a range of options to our customers, allowing them to match the price they want to pay to the capacity they require. We are always keen to understand and resolve customer issues and have been in dialogue with Andrews and Arnold around their specific concerns. We are of course open to further discussions with Andrews and Arnold via the normal customer service routes - our door is always open."

Andrews and Arnold has a track record of being among the first ISPs to speak out over problems at BT. It'll be interesting to see if anyone else has criticism for 21CN. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Wanna keep your data for 1,000 YEARS? No? Hard luck, HDS wants you to anyway
Combine Blu-ray and M-DISC and you get this monster
US boffins demo 'twisted radio' mux
OAM takes wireless signals to 32 Gbps
Apple flops out 2FA for iCloud in bid to stop future nude selfie leaks
Millions of 4chan users howl with laughter as Cupertino slams stable door
No biggie: EMC's XtremIO firmware upgrade 'will wipe data'
But it'll have no impact and will be seamless, we're told
Students playing with impressive racks? Yes, it's cluster comp time
The most comprehensive coverage the world has ever seen. Ever
Run little spreadsheet, run! IBM's Watson is coming to gobble you up
Big Blue's big super's big appetite for big data in big clouds for big analytics
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.