The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Ads watchdog whacks Orange over coverage claim

Geographical reach != population spread

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

Orange has been told not to claim in its adverts that its 3G mobile broadband network "covers more people in the UK" than any other operator's network does - at least without defining 'coverage' more tightly.

The judgement, from the UK's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), follows a complaint from rival carrier Three, which reckons it has the bigger network - in terms of population coverage, if not geographical spread.

Orange's ad, run in local newspapers, was headlined "top dongle" over a pic of its own 3G modem.

In response to the complaint, Orange said Three's own figures, published on the Three website, put its population coverage at 91 per cent. Orange claims 93.4 per cent population coverage, putting it ahead.

Orange did acknowledge that Three has the larger geographical reach of the two operators, the ASA said. That's handy because the ASA said it had checked with telecoms watchdog Ofcom and found that to be the indeed the case.

However, the claim made in Orange's ad "was ambiguous in the context of a mobile broadband service because it did not make clear whether it was referring to Orange covering more people in the places where they lived than any other operator - population coverage - or more people in the UK, wherever they might be using their 3G mobile device - geographical coverage", the ASA said.

It's worth noting that population coverage isn't as clear cut as geographical coverage, thanks to the uncertain nature of the methodologies each network uses to work these things out - methods that they do no make public. For its part, Ofcom hasn't said how it calculates population coverage either.

Given the vague nature of the population coverage claim, it's possible, the ASA suggested, that a network may well believe it has a greater reach than its rivals. Orange's mistake, then, was not make such a claim but to fail to make it clear that it was talking specifically about population coverage and not geographical extent. ®

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

How about..?

Couldn't they just say 'UP TO 93.4%', then the ASA would slap them on the back and buy them all trebles.

1
0

Re: Meanwhile, here in Camden Town with Orange...

Are you holding your phone correctly??

0
0

Not really similar

To use El Reg's own terms, the Voda/O2 deal is to share "Power supplies and Air Conditioners".

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
UK telcos chuck another £1m at online child abuse watchdog
Web enforcers IWF gain power to seek and destroy illegal content
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
Increased cell phone coverage tied to uptick in African violence
'Significantly and substantially increases the probability of violent conflict'
 breaking news
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?