Feeds

Google can kill or install apps on citizen Androids

Vanished 'RootStrap' masqueraded as movie preview

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

Oberheide, it turns out, has gotten to know Google's Rich Cannings at various security conferences, and it was Cannings who asked him to remove the applications from the Market. With his blog post, Oberheide also says that according to Cannings, this is the first time Google has used its REMOVE_ASSET mechanism. Unlike some, Oberheide isn't fussed about Google's kill switch. But he does take issue with its INSTALL_APP mechanism.

Both mechanisms operate over a persistent TCP/SSL/XMPP connection that Google maintains between its servers and Android handsets via a service called GTalkService. "If an attacker is able to MITM [man in the middle] this SSL GTalkService connection for a particular device, it may be possible to spoof these INSTALL_ASSET messages to deliver a malicious application payload. If Google’s GTalkService servers were compromised, the malicious impact would obviously be a bit more widespread," he says.

"You better believe that myself and others are taking a careful look at these code paths."

He adds that the INSTALL_ASSET is invoked every time the user installs an application on their own through the Android Market – meaning it's a fundamental part of Google's setup. "Instead of downloading the APK [Android package] from the Market, clicking ‘Install’ will trigger Google’s servers to push a INSTALL_ASSET message down the GTalkService pipe. Upon receiving this message, your phone will download and install the APK," he says.

We still say the kill switch is more unsettling – little different from Amazon's Orwellian ability to remotely remove books from the Kindle. Amazon may say it won't use the thing, but it can be legally compelled to do so. Or it may use it for fear of legal action.

It's unclear whether Google's "kill switch" can remove applications that were not download through the Android Market. But Oberheide tells us he's working to reverse engineer the tool, in an effort to determine whether it can. ®

The next step in data security

More from The Register

next story
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Infosec geniuses hack a Canon PRINTER and install DOOM
Internet of Stuff securo-cockups strike yet again
'Speargun' program is fantasy, says cable operator
We just might notice if you cut our cables
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
YouTube, Amazon and Yahoo! caught in malvertising mess
Cisco says 'Kyle and Stan' attack is spreading through compromised ad networks
Hackers pop Brazil newspaper to root home routers
Step One: try default passwords. Step Two: Repeat Step One until success
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
Microsoft to patch ASP.NET mess even if you don't
We know what's good for you, because we made the mess says Redmond
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.