Feeds

Facebook in 'solid net profit' shocker

2009 revenues topped $700m, says report

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Facebook pulled in a $700 to $800 million in revenue during 2009, according to a report citing two sources familiar with the situation.

Reuters reports that last year, the social networking site made actually made a "solid" net profit — somewhere in the tens of millions of dollars.

These figures are higher than expected for the still-private outfit. Last July, Facebook board member and Netscape founder Marc Andreessen told Reuters that the company expected revenues of around $500 million in 2009, and more recent press reports have put 2009 revenues between $500 million and $700 million.

"They are downplaying their performance," one Reuters source said of Facebook. "There's no upside in getting people's expectations high, it's always better to go low."

In September, Facebook said it had become cash-flow positive, but prior to that there had been much speculation over whether the company was bringing in the cash needed to maintain its massive back-end infrastructure.

According to a July 2008 analysis from Data Center Knowledge, Facebook was spending somewhere between $20m and $25m a year on data center space. The previous November, unnamed sources told TechCrunch that the company was spending "well over" a million a month on electricity alone and "likely" another $500,000 for bandwidth. And of course, spending was on the rise.

At the beginning of 2009, Facebook said it was serving 150 million users. By the end of the year, this figure had more than doubled to 350 million.

Housing photos for 350 million Web 2.0 obsessives isn't cheap, and many have questioned whether the site was as suited to advertising as the company claimed it to be — in 2008, Google told the world that advertising on social networking sites was "not monetizing" as well as expected — but it would appear that Facebook's advertising revenues are on the rise.

A source tells Reuters that Facebook's 2009 revenues were more than double the revenues of the previous year. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.