The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

ISPs agree to cheaper contract buyouts

Firing your provider to cost less

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

The country's three biggest broadband and home phone providers have agreed to slash their charges to customers who cancel their contracts early, following pressure from regulators.

BT, TalkTalk and Virgin Media have previously made subscribers pay full or nearly full charges for every month left on their contract in order to release them early.

From October (June 1 for TalkTalk) they will all levy significantly less than their previous monthly early termination charges - on some packages up to 85 per cent less.

For example, cancelling TalkTalk's Essential home phone and broadband package early previously cost £33.48 for each month left on the contract. Breaking the deal now costs £8 per month. There's a full breakdown of the new charges for each of the three firms here.

Ofcom has waged an 18-month campaign to cut cancellation charges. In December 2008 it published an opinion that providers were breaching their obligations under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999.

The regulator said it now expects other home phone and broadband providers to follow suit by slashing their charges, and threatened enforcement action if they resist. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Contract

It's a contract which you agreed to. Simple at first glance. But I object t being forced to have a contract when it isn't necessary. Fair enough to lock someone into a contract if the length of the contract is necessary for the provider to recover the upfront costs of equipment, lines and so on. But if my new provider is simply taking over an already-installed line from a previous provider and is not providing anything new themselves, there should not have to be a contract at all. Imagine if shopping at Tesco the first time locked you into an exclusive Tesco-only contract for the next 12 months.

I especially object to BT's habit of automatically rolling you over into a new 12 month contract when your old one finishes. That is completely unnecessary and can only be to be anti-competitive toward consumers who aren't paying attention.

5
0

Why Pay?

Why Pay? As long as your connected to an exchange with BT equipment, download as much as you can over a month (1TB+) they will soon end your contract. Works a treat.

5
0
Anonymous Coward

How about...

... if BT offer me an 'upgrade', why should I have to submit to another minimum term?

Reducing the cost of contract buyouts is one thing. How about addressing the real problem - that of pigopolistic rolling minimum term contracts.

4
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
 breaking news
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?
 breaking news
White Space wonga time: White House tips $100m into next-gen comms
Empty frequencies right place for tomorrow's mics, phones and fridges