Apple slapped with lawsuit over 'iAds' monicker
'Trampling the rights of others.' Again
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Another day, another lawsuit for Apple. This time Jobs & Company are being taken to task for naming the iPhone's new mobile-advertising platform "iAds" when that service mark is already owned by a Southern California media company.
Online ad firm Innovate Media Group of Costa Mesa, California, has filed suit in the US District Court of the Central District of California, charging that Apple has knowingly usurped their rights to the term iAds.
"It appears that Apple's strategy with respect to Innovate Media and the 'iAds' mark is just another sequence in a pattern of conduct by Apple, of ignoring and trampling the intellectual property rights of others," the suit reads.
It appears that Innovate Media may have a point. The US Patent and Trademak Office has five live listings for the term "iAds"; three are related to vehicle-test software and the other two — owned by the Innovate Media Group — are 3,515,183, for "Production of video and creation of visual effects and graphics for others for use on websites," and 3,515,184, for "Transmission of sound, video and information over the internet using video flash overlay technology". Both were filed on October 25, 2007 and registered on October 14, 2008, and both note a "first use in commerce" date of August 1, 2006.
Court documents claim that after Steve Jobs announced Apple's iAds program at the iPhone iOS 4's April 8 coming out party, Innovate Media contacted him and "informed him that Innovate Media had trademarked 'iAds' in 2008". The company also claims to have contacted Quattro Wireless, the mobile-ad group that Apple acquired this January. Neither, the suit says, have responded.
"As a result of Apple's refusal to acknowledge Innovate Media's 'iAds' marks, and blatant and willful infringement of those marks," the suit reads, "Innovate Media has been left with little choice but to file this lawsuit seeking injuntive relief, damages and other relief."
The suit also notes that such "blatant and willful infringment" is nothing new for Apple: "'iPhone,' 'iPad,' and even 'Apple' were all marks held by third parties, which Apple used without the owners' permission, and ultimately took over," the suit notes.
As The Reg reported last week, Apple entered into agreements with Cisco to use its "IOS" name for Cupertino's newly renamed mobile operating system, and with instant messaging outfit Facetime to transfer its rights to Cupertino so that Apple can dub its iPhone4–to–iPhone 4 videoconferencing system.
But Cisco had to take Apple to court over the iPhone name, which it owned, and Fujitsu and Apple reached a settlement over the name iPad, which Fujitsu owned, after announcing but before releasing the "magical and revolutionary" device.
Apparently Jobs didn't think that the Southern California internet ad firm, Innovate Media, was worth dealing with before he announced Apple's iAds program. Or maybe he thinks he's exempt due to that service-mark language about "video flash overlay technology". ®
COMMENTS
Title
One has to wonder how much trouble and bad media Apple could avoid if they would just respond to letters or eamails such as those in this lawsuit. It would probalby cost them far less to be open and negotiate some sort of licenseing agreement in stead of going through the courts, paying unknown legal fees and ultimately losing and having to pay damages as well as licensing fees. But then again, their coffers are full of cash from all their mindless minions who rush out to buy the latest shiny toy offered by the puppet masters of Cupertino.
Apple is worse than...
People say that Microsoft is the nazi outfit, the big steamroller (I like to dub them the big gay steamroller due to their multicolored emblem, much like the gay pride rainbow), but apple is far worse than microsoft ever dreamed of. If bill and steve went to the same evil dictator school, bill must have dropped out his junior year where steve graduated valedictorian of his class.
Just to clarify, i dont own nor will i ever own an apple product*, period, and I openly taunt the people i know who do own apple products.
* I was given an ipod once by a customer of mine who received it as a gift and didnt want to insult the generosity of the gift giver by refusing it, i in turn gave it to the daughter of a business associate that i find really annoying (the associate not the daughter) as a gift. He expresses his dismay to me regularly, complaining about the downstream cost of my "gift" and about the restrictive nature of the device and its software. go figure...
As a wise man once said:
"Change your app's name. Not that big of a deal."
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
