Feeds

ParaScale shrugs off funding fail and declares 'We're rockstars'

Like Hendrix? Morrison? Elvis?

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Comment Cloud network-attached storage (NAS) startup ParaScale has been forced into some emergency self-surgery after failing to seal a funding round. What is happening and where is it going?

Founder and chief technology officer Cameron Bahar said: "It is true that we were not able to raise our series-B round of financing with Sajai Krishnan at the helm. We're still here and have down-sized the team to reduce our burn rate while we evaluate our options going forward."

Sajai Krishnan was replaced as CEO by Ken Fehrnstrom a couple of months or so ago.

Bahar said its current travails were neither a marketing or product problem: "Interestingly we have had a lot of interest from both enterprise and service providers for our cloud storage product and have sold product into both environments.

"Our current predicament is a financing problem and not a fundamental market/product problem."

The Register story about ParaScale this week raised questions about the logic of running applications on the storage nodes of a ParaScale cluster.

"NAS does NOT allow you to run applications directly on the data (locally) and requires shuttling of data across the network from NAS to compute servers," Bahar explained. "NAS is a closed storage appliance.

"Think of Hadoop and MapReduce applications to understand the benefits of a scale-out reliable storage platform that allows applications to run locally, providing significant performance boost to data mining and other data intensive applications such as video analytics/etc.

"Because our product provides a shared-nothing scale-out storage platform that is read/write and has NFS access, it's ideal for fast/parallel ingest of machine-generated data and processing."

We opined that there was little room in the well-developed NAS market for ParaScale. Bahar disagrees. "This is a novel and interesting use-case that our product is a great fit for besides the crowded generic NAS market. Think of a solution that allows you to persistently store, manage, and analyze unstructured data."

"We have a rock star team, and a tough situation to deal with. Wish us luck." ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Oracle hires former SAP exec for cloudy push
'We know Larry said cloud was gibberish, and insane, and idiotic, but...'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.