Bank of America insider admits he stole sensitive customer data
Account balances under $100,000 need not apply
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
An employee in one of Bank of America's customer call centers has admitted he stole sensitive account information and tried to sell it for cash.
Brian Matty Hagen said he met with two individuals whom he later learned were undercover FBI agents and offered to sell them names, dates of birth, telephonic passwords, and other details for Bank of America customers, according to court records. He met with them at a restaurant in Sun City, Florida, where he told them he was looking for accomplices who knew how to milk the accounts by establishing phony credit cards in the customers' names or through other means.
At first, Hagen demanded at least half of the resulting take, but later was talked down to 25 percent. He demanded he be paid in cash and said he'd only deal with accounts that had balances exceeding $100,000.
Last week, he pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud. He faces a maximum penalty of 30 years in federal prison and a $1m fine. Prosecutors agreed to recommend a much lower sentence in exchange for his cooperation.
Hagen was able to access the private data using his position as a call center attendant. When one customer identified by the initials E.H.S. called to find out if automatic payments to a Netflix account had been stopped, Hagen captured the customer's data and turned it over to the undercover fed. E.H.S. had a balance of almost $445,000. He told the agent he planned to keep working at Bank of America even after the money was stolen.
The incident is a reminder of the threats banks and other sensitive organizations face from insiders. Prosecutors said potential losses to Bank of America exceeded $1.3m. ®
COMMENTS
Git
If someone did an expose on how many people in the world can easily call up your details I think there'd be outrage. Masses of gov. employees you wouldn't trust with a spare watch, tonnes of bank/etc workers, any hackers with half a brain, the intelligence services, & frankly anyone who actually wants to find out probably could.
yes but...
Sarbanes-Oxley has required US listed companies to restrict how financially sensitive systems are accessed, and banking laws restrict how authentication is handled. There should be ZERO access to the entire telephonic password, instead there should only be a limited selection of letters that the telephone operative can enter to see if the customer is authenticated. Seems the BOA has some archaic systems going on here.
It wont stop someone in a bank gleaning details from your account if you call them, but it should stop them accessing it when they feel like it. Seems the US could do with catching up with europe for some of this security.
That's the problem.
He was a "target of opportunity" skimmer. He didn't just pull up accounts willy-nilly. He skimmed the details he happened to call up (legally and at the request of proper account holders) during his regular duties at work. And someone with a strong enough memory could probably walk away with plenty of damaging data without leaving any evidence of a skimming.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
