Feeds
55%
Blur

Blur vs Split Second Velocity

Which of these new racing games takes the chequered flag?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Graphics

Blur

More demands on a lap than Santa

Graphically, Blur is surprisingly bland for a Bizarre Creations' racer. The art design is poor, particularly so in the generic steel-glass buildings. Key landmarks aside, there isn't much track-side detail. The aesthetic favours the primary colours and shiny surfaces that blighted early 360 games, such as Perfect Dark Zero. And the pallid neons of its weaponry further drain tangibility from its world.

Although Split Second's rich palette seems initially cartoon-esque, it retains a feeling of real-world thanks to a higher polygon count. Given that practically all its objects are destructible, it's ironic that they feel weightier, more robust than those in Blur. It's this destructibility that proves Split Second's greatest graphical achievement. The animations and pyrotechnics of buildings toppling, car ferries exploding and aircraft crashing, to name just a few, look beautiful, and never cease to amaze.

Split Second: Velocity

Don't look down

Blur 10%
Split Second: Velocity 15%

Security for virtualized datacentres

Next page: Gameplay

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.