Feeds

Oracle kills AMD Opteron on Sun iron

Sun volume server master plan gutted

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Oracle is abandoning AMD's Opteron processors, according to a person familiar with the company's server plans.

The new owner of Sun Microsystems will not use the new Opteron 6100 and impending Opteron 4100 processors in future Sun Fire x64 servers, and all existing Opteron servers will be discontinued.

Thus ends an Opteron era that began with an impressive bang back in 2003 when IBM and then Sun enthusiastically embraced the Opteron because — at the time — Intel's 32-bit, frontside-bussed Xeons were just plain awful.

Oracle laid out a rough sketch of its server plans back in January, after closing the Sun Microsystems acquisition. But additional details have be scant.

In January, Charles Phillips, Oracle's co-president, said the company is not interested in being in the commodity x64 server racket. John Fowler — executive vice president of hardware engineering at Oracle who used to run the Systems Group at Sun — said that Oracle would focus x64 servers on enterprise-class products used in clusters. In other words — though Oracle never came right out and said this — the company was not going to have the plethora of different rack and blade machines in various shapes and sizes, but would streamline its products. This is understandable considering that Sun's volume approach had generated some revenues but probably lost Sun a fair amount of money.

Oracle has not been precise about exactly what it would do to streamline its x64 server lineup, but circumstantial evidence indicates that Oracle isn't exactly an enthusiastic x64 supporter. Sun was the most gung-ho of the Opteron server makers, but Oracle was quiet as a dead mouse when the twelve-core "Magny-Cours" Opteron 6100s and their related chipsets were announced by Advanced Micro Devices at the end of March. And it was equally quiet when Intel announced its six-core "Westmere-EP" Xeon 5600 chips two weeks earlier.

On March 30, at the eight-core "Nehalem-EX" Xeon 7500 launch in San Francisco, Oracle showed off an unnamed box presumably supporting the Xeon 7500s. As The Register previously reported, Oracle has been tweaking Solaris 10 to run well on eight-socket Xeon machines (which can only be built with Xeon 7500-class processors). Oracle did sneak out a Sun Fire X2270 M2 blade server sporting the new Xeon 5600s, and Intel's presentations about who is doing what with the Xeon 7500s show that Oracle is working on an eight-socket box.

The lack of Opteron machines was telling. And a source familiar with Oracle's plans tells The Reg that all Opteron servers will be end-of-lifed.

Oracle did not respond to repeated requests for comment, saying it is still in its quiet period ahead of reporting its next financial results. And AMD referred us back to Oracle. "With respect to your question on Oracle's future plans for hardware, specific details about any server vendor's overall strategy are best addressed by that vendor," AMD told us. "In the server space, we don't believe that a credible hardware vendor looking to satisfy business customers' needs today can do so without a leading industry-standard x86 solution. The datacenter is in transition now. Customers are facing a delayed refresh cycle and they are looking for maximum value."

But Oracle did discuss its x64 plans with server analysts at a recent event in Australia. A May 5 blog post from Ideas International analyst Gary Burgess discussed a speech from Shane Sigler, Oracle's director of strategic engagement for systems, that he delivered as part of an Oracle's "Welcome Event" for Sun customers:

The biggest news for Ideas at the event was Mr Sigler's announcement that Oracle intends to go forward with just a single x86 processor architecture. The company will bring to market new Sun x86 server using the Intel processor architecture, and has no plans to develop any new servers with the AMD processors, including Magny-Cours. In fact, Mr. Sigler said that the company is in the process of EOL'ing the current family of AMD x86 servers.

That seems like a pretty clear statement. But when we asked for Fowler or Sigler or anyone else at Oracle to get on the phone and chat about this, the company did not respond.

And if you visit Burgess's blog post today, it reads a bit differently:

It appears that the company may focus on Sun x86 servers using only the Intel processor architecture. If true, (and there has been no formal announcement yet) this would be a big turnaround from the birth of Sun's "Galaxy" x86 offerings, which at that time ran exclusively on AMD Opteron processors. IDEAS speculates that is probably a reflection of how Intel has been able to turn things around of late, especially with its latest generation Nehalem family of server processors it has brought to market in phases over the past 12 months.

Both the past and current version of the blog written by Burgess says that Sigler told attendees at the Sun Welcome Event in Sydney that the Fire X4100 and X4200 machines are integral to the Exadata OLTP/data warehousing appliances and that the X2200 blades are key to Sun's HPC supercomputers and will see continued development.

You can't blame Oracle for wanting to simplify the Sun server lineup and to forge a tight partnership with Intel. The chip maker has come a long way in seven years with its Xeon lineup, and Oracle wants to make money more than it wants to make boxes with the hope of maybe making money.

But Oracle has a lot to learn about being clear to customers and channel partners about what its roadmaps for both x64 and Sparc servers are, which should be a source of comfort, not concern. It's doing a worse job than Sun in this regard, and that is not a good thing.

A few pesky journalists and Wall Street analysts asking questions and being uncertain is one thing. Thousands of Sun customers not being able to plan their server acquisitions is quite another. Maybe Oracle will be a little more forthcoming when it announces some new Xeon servers in June, as it is rumored to be doing. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
Astro-boffins start opening universe simulation data
Got a supercomputer? Want to simulate a universe? Here you go
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.