Feeds

NetApp comes up trumps with fat annual profit

I'm too sixy

Boost IT visibility and business value

NetApp vindicated its middle-of-the-road virtualisation and cloud service provider stance with a sixfold increase in annual profits.

The company is sticking to a core unified storage strategy, avoiding extensions of its product line into extreme scale-out NAS like Isilon, high-end enterprise storage like Symmetrix, or low-end products like those from Drobo or Iomega. It is also not present in the high growth deduplicating backup array market after failing to buy Data Domain, and it has eschewed adding flash solid state drives (SSDs) to its arrays, preferring flash caching in the array controllers - the products are just not glamorous.

Yet it has recorded revenues of $3.93bn for its fiscal 2010 year with a $400m net income, up from the $3.41bn revenue for 2009 and its $65m profit, a huge rise in profit. Fourth quarter revenue in fiscal 2010 was $1.17bn ($880m a year ago) with net income being $145m, comparing very well with the $68m reported a year ago.

CEO Tom Georgens said there had been a 50 per cent growth in product sales. In this mid-range sector of the market NetApp's single-minded unified product focus has enabled its growth to outstrip EMC, HP and Dell, and probably IBM too. That company, which resells NetApp products as its N-Series, contributed three per cent of NetApp's revenues.

NetApp now has over 5,000 V-Series predicts shipped, the ones that enable third-party arrays to be brought into the NetApp fold.

What lies ahead? There are persistent rumours of a high-end refresh for the FAS 6000 and surely SSD enclosures must be on the roadmap. Competitors like EMC are federating their arrays across data centres - the VPlex product - and 3PAR maybe doing something there too, so NetApp may have a federalisation element creeping into its plans.

It also has the object storage technology it has acquired with Bycast, although nothing public has been said about how it will integrate this with its existing technology.

Chairman Dan Warmenhoven must be looking on approvingly while his anointed successor as CEO, Tom Georgens, delivers the revenue and profit goods, and keeps the good ship NetApp on a steady course propelled by storage market trade winds, the strength and direction of which it appears to have read better than anybody else. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Community chest: Storage firms need to pay open-source debts
Samba implementation? Time to get some devs on the job
Like condoms, data now comes in big and HUGE sizes
Linux Foundation lights a fire under storage devs with new conference
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.