Feeds

NetApp comes up trumps with fat annual profit

I'm too sixy

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

NetApp vindicated its middle-of-the-road virtualisation and cloud service provider stance with a sixfold increase in annual profits.

The company is sticking to a core unified storage strategy, avoiding extensions of its product line into extreme scale-out NAS like Isilon, high-end enterprise storage like Symmetrix, or low-end products like those from Drobo or Iomega. It is also not present in the high growth deduplicating backup array market after failing to buy Data Domain, and it has eschewed adding flash solid state drives (SSDs) to its arrays, preferring flash caching in the array controllers - the products are just not glamorous.

Yet it has recorded revenues of $3.93bn for its fiscal 2010 year with a $400m net income, up from the $3.41bn revenue for 2009 and its $65m profit, a huge rise in profit. Fourth quarter revenue in fiscal 2010 was $1.17bn ($880m a year ago) with net income being $145m, comparing very well with the $68m reported a year ago.

CEO Tom Georgens said there had been a 50 per cent growth in product sales. In this mid-range sector of the market NetApp's single-minded unified product focus has enabled its growth to outstrip EMC, HP and Dell, and probably IBM too. That company, which resells NetApp products as its N-Series, contributed three per cent of NetApp's revenues.

NetApp now has over 5,000 V-Series predicts shipped, the ones that enable third-party arrays to be brought into the NetApp fold.

What lies ahead? There are persistent rumours of a high-end refresh for the FAS 6000 and surely SSD enclosures must be on the roadmap. Competitors like EMC are federating their arrays across data centres - the VPlex product - and 3PAR maybe doing something there too, so NetApp may have a federalisation element creeping into its plans.

It also has the object storage technology it has acquired with Bycast, although nothing public has been said about how it will integrate this with its existing technology.

Chairman Dan Warmenhoven must be looking on approvingly while his anointed successor as CEO, Tom Georgens, delivers the revenue and profit goods, and keeps the good ship NetApp on a steady course propelled by storage market trade winds, the strength and direction of which it appears to have read better than anybody else. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
AWS pulls desktop-as-a-service from the PC
Support for PCoIP protocol means zero clients can run cloudy desktops
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.