The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Microsoft fills Outlook crack with Apachesource

.PST opens up

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Microsoft has created a pair of Apache-licensed open-source projects to crack open its ubiquitous Office suite.

The company said the projects will let developers building non-Microsoft and non-Windows applications browse, read and extract emails, calendar, contacts and events information currently encased in Outlook's .pst file format. The ability to write data will be added to the SDK in the "near future", Microsoft said.

Currently, applications can only access Outlook using Outlook on client or Exchange with applications written using Microsoft's MAPI and Outlook Object Model.

The projects offer a PST Data Structure View Tool and a PST File Format SDK. They're available on CodePlex, here and here, the project-hosting site created by Microsoft.

Earlier this year, Microsoft published a 200-page technical document describing .pst, following its promise to open the file format in late 2009.

The .pst format has been released under Microsoft's Open Specification Promise, which lets "anyone to implement the .pst file format on any platform and in any tool, without concerns about patents, and without the need to contact Microsoft in any way".

Paul Lorimer, group manager for Microsoft Office interoperability, said at the time the move would let developers read, create, and interoperate with the data in .pst files in server and client scenarios using the programming language and platform of their choice.

All very neighbourly. Except that Microsoft has been forced to provide more details on how to work with Outlook, in addition to Office with OOXML, as governments increasingly expect their data to be open and accessible, and not encased in a single file format or on one company's platform.

Office has also seen a challenge in recent years from Google Docs and OpenOffice, which uses the ODF file format Microsoft countered with OOXML and is pushed by IBM and others as an alternative to Office - home to Outlook.

Lorimer noted interoperability had become "an increasing need for our customers and partners as more information is stored and shared in digital formats".

Open sourcers have tried on their own to crack open the Outlook/Exchange hegemony. Past efforts have included the Evolution email, address book and calendar system for Linux desktops with the Ximian connector to Exchange, so Evolution could work with Exchange servers.

These efforts, though, have failed to gain mass market share and left Outlook firmly entrenched as the default email client for business and looking unassailable - until now. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

This looks like yet another half-baked open sourcing

It's only use is to confuse IT illiterate decision makers into thinking Microsoft is opening up and has interoperability.

3
0

Backups

A nightly back-up for a home/small business user, such as myself, is so easy with a stand alone version of Outlook - just copy the .pst files to the servers and back up folders.

Of course I could always have an Exchange server in house but that's overkill and it's going to need all sort of back-end servers running domains. And that's a bitch to back-up for a one man band trying to concentrate on doing real stuff.

The .pst file is an excellent format and even if my files are about four gig in size the thing still backs up each day

Outlook Express? If that is ever an answer then it must be a bloody stupid question.

2
0

Until Now?

"These efforts, though, have failed to gain mass market share and left Outlook firmly entrenched as the default email client for business and looking unassailable - until now."

Umm... I disagree Everyone is still firmly entrenched, and as the half-way one way opening of the spec progresses, I imaging they at least think they will be able to more firmly entrench everyone.

This is bad and no-one should bite the poison bait. You can read from Outlook, but not write too outlook. This means you would still need outlook.

Everyone should avoid like the plague until the "promised" write capability is delivered.

Soon could be 30 years in Microsofts head.

2
0

More from The Register

Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry
Apple at WWDC: Sleek new iOS, death of the big cats, pint-sized Mac Pro
CEO Cook: 'The biggest change to iOS since the introduction of the iPhone'