The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Sir Paul McBeatle: 'Me, I'd love Beatles to be on iTunes'

EMI: 'Us too'. Jobsians keep schtum

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

You can blame him for "Band on the Run" or "Ebony and Ivory," but according to Sir Paul McCartney, it's not his fault that the Fab Four's oeuvre isn't available on iTunes.

"It's been business hassles," the world's most famous left-handed bass guitarist told the BBC's Newsbeat. "Not with us, or iTunes. It's the people in the middle, the record label. There have been all sorts of reasons why they don't want to do it."

It's EMI's fault, in other words. But in a sniffily worded soupçon of corporatese, EMI told Newsbeat: "Discussions are ongoing. We would love to see The Beatles' music available for sale digitally."

Which, of course, means absolutely zero, zip, squat, zilch, or - to use a word that might get you deported from Arizona - nada.

Even on the day that Apple launched iTunes back in April 2003, the question of "Where are the Beatles?" was raised. Since then, rumors have repeatedly surfaced and resurfaced that the song stylings of Sir Paul, Yoko's husband, one of the top 10,000 guitarists in Liverpool, and Pete Best's replacement were about to become available on Apple's mega-über–ultrasuccessful online music store.

But nope. Not yet, at least.

"To tell you the truth I don't actually understand how it's got so crazy," the baby-faced billionaire told Newsbeat.

But it's not his fault. It's EMI's. And discussions are ongoing. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Yet another Scouse sense-of-humour fail

The most overrated band in history if you ask me.

Go ahead, vote me down if you like, just remember that disagreeing != trolling.

7
0

So it's not permitted for a journo...

... to have different tastes from you?

Personally, I agree with the journo: The Beatles are overrated and insufferably pretentious. An utter cliché of all that was wrong about the 1960s. Liverpudlians shouldn't be proud of them, but *embarrassed*.

5
0

So What?

Let's face it. By the time the Beatles catalogue actually gets onto iTunes or any other legal service, anyone who wants the songs would already have them via BitTorrent in FLAC or another lossless format.

By holding out, EMI are just shooting themselves in the foot (again).

5
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
BBC-featured call centre slapped with hefty fine for unwanted calls
PPI pests: Swansea-based firm stung for £225k by ICO
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?
 breaking news
O2 averts strike action over mass Capita outsourcing deal
Details of new agreement not yet released