Sir Paul McBeatle: 'Me, I'd love Beatles to be on iTunes'
EMI: 'Us too'. Jobsians keep schtum
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
You can blame him for "Band on the Run" or "Ebony and Ivory," but according to Sir Paul McCartney, it's not his fault that the Fab Four's oeuvre isn't available on iTunes.
"It's been business hassles," the world's most famous left-handed bass guitarist told the BBC's Newsbeat. "Not with us, or iTunes. It's the people in the middle, the record label. There have been all sorts of reasons why they don't want to do it."
It's EMI's fault, in other words. But in a sniffily worded soupçon of corporatese, EMI told Newsbeat: "Discussions are ongoing. We would love to see The Beatles' music available for sale digitally."
Which, of course, means absolutely zero, zip, squat, zilch, or - to use a word that might get you deported from Arizona - nada.
Even on the day that Apple launched iTunes back in April 2003, the question of "Where are the Beatles?" was raised. Since then, rumors have repeatedly surfaced and resurfaced that the song stylings of Sir Paul, Yoko's husband, one of the top 10,000 guitarists in Liverpool, and Pete Best's replacement were about to become available on Apple's mega-über–ultrasuccessful online music store.
But nope. Not yet, at least.
"To tell you the truth I don't actually understand how it's got so crazy," the baby-faced billionaire told Newsbeat.
But it's not his fault. It's EMI's. And discussions are ongoing. ®
COMMENTS
Yet another Scouse sense-of-humour fail
The most overrated band in history if you ask me.
Go ahead, vote me down if you like, just remember that disagreeing != trolling.
So it's not permitted for a journo...
... to have different tastes from you?
Personally, I agree with the journo: The Beatles are overrated and insufferably pretentious. An utter cliché of all that was wrong about the 1960s. Liverpudlians shouldn't be proud of them, but *embarrassed*.
So What?
Let's face it. By the time the Beatles catalogue actually gets onto iTunes or any other legal service, anyone who wants the songs would already have them via BitTorrent in FLAC or another lossless format.
By holding out, EMI are just shooting themselves in the foot (again).

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth