Feeds

The IT security blame game

Who carries the can and who should?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Workshop Poll The word “governance” is one that tends to make most peoples’ eyes glaze over. But whether we are talking about running a corporation, managing an IT department or dealing with IT security, there has to be a mechanism in place for making sure that the right things are taken care of in an acceptable manner. And cutting through all the theory, that’s basically what governance boils down to. A big part of this is being clear on who is responsible for what, and who carries the can when it all goes wrong. And this is the subject of this week’s poll. So if you have a few minutes to spare get clicking below:

READER POLL: THE IT SECURITY BLAME GAME

1. Who has ultimate responsibility for the following aspects of IT security?

  Exclusively IT IT led, supported by the business Business & IT together Business led, supported by IT Exclusively the business
General system security  
Identification of needs
Prioritisation of actions
Allocation of funding
Allocation of man power
Selection of tools, etc
Implementation of tools, etc
Day to day running of security infrastructure
Monitoring of effectiveness
Other (please specify)
Information security  
Identification of needs
Prioritisation of actions
Allocation of funding
Allocation of man power
Selection of tools, etc
Implementation of tools, etc
Day to day running of security infrastructure
Monitoring of effectiveness
Other (please specify)

2. How much would you agree or disagree with the following statements?

  Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Business stakeholders don’t appreciate how important some aspects of IT security really are
We have a genuine problem figuring out what we should or shouldn’t be prioritising from an IT security perspective
IT security is generally underfunded in the organisation
IT security is funded OK, but we generally have to fight tooth and nail for every penny we get
Business stakeholders demand IT security, but delegate far too much to the IT department
Business stakeholders just don’t care enough about IT security
IT gets the blame when things go wrong even though they had previously flagged up the risk
Other (please specify)

3. If you could change one thing to improve the way security priorities are set and funded what would it be?

 

BEFORE YOU GO

4. Approximately how large is your organisation (worldwide) in terms of employees?

Less than 10 employees
10 to 50 employees
50 to 250 employees
250 to 1,000 employees
1,000 to 5,000 employees
5,000 to 10,000 employees
Over 10,000 employees

7. Which of the following best describes your organisation?

Energy & Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Hi-Tech
Manufacturing
Oil & Gas
Pharmaceuticals
Central/Local Government
Retail & wholesale
Professional services
Telecommunications
Travel & Transportation
Other (please specify)

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Obama allows NSA to exploit 0-days: report
If the spooks say they need it, they get it
Parent gabfest Mumsnet hit by SSL bug: My heart bleeds, grins hacker
Natter-board tells middle-class Britain to purée its passwords
Web data BLEEDOUT: Users to feel the pain as Heartbleed bug revealed
Vendors and ISPs have work to do updating firmware - if it's possible to fix this
OpenSSL Heartbleed: Bloody nose for open-source bleeding hearts
Bloke behind the cockup says not enough people are helping crucial crypto project
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Call of Duty 'fragged using OpenSSL's Heartbleed exploit'
So it begins ... or maybe not, says one analyst
German space centre endures cyber attack
Chinese code retrieved but NSA hack not ruled out
Experian subsidiary faces MEGA-PROBE for 'selling consumer data to fraudster'
US attorneys general roll up sleeves, snap on gloves
prev story

Whitepapers

Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
HP ArcSight ESM solution helps Finansbank
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.