The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

'Completely useless' Windows 3.1 hits Google's Android

Operating systems I have known

Cloud based data management

First, it was Windows Vista on the iPhone. Now, an even earlier Microsoft creation has been updated for the smartphone set.

Windows 3.1 has been ported to Google's Linux-based Android phone platform by developer Shawn McHenry using the DOSBox emulator.

DOSBox is usually used to run old MS-DOS games for Intel x86 PCs that can't run modern operating systems such as Window XP, Vista, Linux or FreeBSD.

Windows 3.1 launched in 1992, bringing Windows to the mass market and paving the way for Windows as we know it today. Windows 3.1 added support for long file names, virtual memory, and the ability to share devices.

Windows 3.1 on Android

Windows 3.1 mounts Android

Why rehabilitate this Microsoft relic from the dawn of modern PC computing? According to McHenry, a self-confessed Android fiddler:

I realized, Hey, Windows can be installed VIA Dos. So I went on google & youtube and looked up "Windows on Android" and what do you know, No results. However, I saw a lot of videos about Windows 95, NT, 3.1, etc on a Nokia. So I thought, I want to try and put it on Android. It appears its never been done before. So I gave it a shot...

McHenry goes on to explain what he did here, but finishes succinctly: "It's completely useless, but really damn cool."

We can't help but wonder whether Windows 3.1 on Android is an omen of Android's future success. After all, the VistaPerfection 2.0 application - from another phone fiddler - gave the iPhone a Windows-Vista look, and the iPhone now has a quarter of the US smartphone market sewn up.

Look out Windows Phone 7. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Fact Check, Please

???

"Windows 3.1 added support for long file names, virtual memory, and the ability to share devices."

-- Long file names. Nope.

-- Virtual memory, yes, but not new in this version.

-- "share devices"? Can't agree or disagree, as I don't understand what that's supposed to mean.

6
0

Whatever else Windows 3.1 did

... it didn't add long filename support. That kludge came along with Windows 95.

4
0

win 3.1 sat directly on DOS so no long filename

Yeah like I said

3
0

More from The Register

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Proof the pen is mightier?
Sammy’s iPad Mini killer has a stylus to stab other rivals too
Microsoft lures buy-curious vixens, corduroys with a cheap fondle
Surface slab sales latest: Will no one rid Ballmer of these turbulent tabs?
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?