Feeds

EMC delivers sub-volume tiering to mid-range

CLARiiON and Celerra get FAST 2

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

CLARRiiON and Celerra arrays have the ability to automatically move chunks of data inside logical volumes from slow to fast access storage tiers and back again.

FAST (Fully-Automated Storage Tiering) currently moves entire logical volumes (LUNs) from, say, high-capacity but slow SATA disk drives to faster drives when the LUN has a high access rate. However, not all data in a LUN is uniformly needed at the same rate. It makes sense to promote only the high-demand chunks of the LUN to faster, and more expensive, storage tiers such as solid state drives (SSDs).

This is what FAST 2 does. It has policy options such as "auto-tiering" moving data chunks on the basis of their I/O pattern, "highest tier" to allocate high-access data to SSD and "lowest tier" to dump low-demand data into the SATA pool.

Finer granularity is better for such tiering and the gold standard here is Compellent's block-level tiering called Data Progression. IBM and 3PAR have both recently introduced their own sub-LUN automated data movement in their arrays, making it pretty much a standard feature of enterprise drive arrays.

FAST 2 is integrated with EMC's Unisphere management software for CLARiiON and Celerra for scheduling and configuring it. Unisphere can be used directly or through VMware. It's been refreshed too, with some reports being generated up to 18 times faster than before.

With FAST 2 data can be automatically compressed by the drive array controller at block-level, and this would typically be done with inactive data on SATA drives, releasing disk capacity for other use.

Another new feature is FAST Cache for CX4 CLARiiONS and Celerra NS arrays, using their SSD storage tier to cache read and write data during what EMC calls unpredicted spikes in application workload. This indicates that FAST 2 may not respond quickly enough to a sudden increase in access rate for a particular piece of data, with FAST Cache overrides the auto-tiering policy in FAST 2, scooping up in-demand data and caching it.

ThIs is comparative to controller SSD caching as offered by NetApp with its PAM (Performance Acceleration Module). The only effective difference is the location of the SSD cache; in the controller with NetApp, and in the array with EMC.

FAST 2, FAST Cache and the new UniSphere will arrive in the third quarter of the year. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.