Feeds

TfL signs £27.6m road CCTV deals

Easynet and Serco contracted in

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Transport for London has awarded Easynet and Serco contracts to upgrade its CCTV cameras monitoring roads.

As part of a project to upgrade the transport authority's CCTV system, it has signed a £22.6m deal with Easynet to deliver data transmission, network integration and support services.

It has also signed a separate £5m deal with Serco to help it move its current analogue CCTV system to digital. Both deals were recorded in the Official Journal of the European Union on 28 April 2010.

"This would improve the flexibility and feature set of the surveillance system, allow users (which include, the Metropolitan Police and London boroughs) and operators to improve the traffic flow of London's road network and bring the CCTV network up to date using the latest digital technology," it says.

The contract will include the provision of a telecoms network and a suite of IP-based communication services, predominantly fixed line, which will be available to be ordered as required.

A spokesperson for TfL told GC News: "What this means is that we are using an analogue connection from BT, but we are using Easynet for an IP communication network. They are providing a managed service, much like the contract we had with BT. The contract will last for six years."

In a separate £5m deal, Serco will migrate TfL's current street analogue CCTV network to a digital and IP-based system. The authority says this will cover its surveillance capabilities and help operators to manage the flow of traffic on London's road.

"Serco will not supply cameras, because we are upgrading the existing cameras from analogue to digital," said a TfL spokesperson. "It's a bit like having a set top box on your television, with Easynet providing the communication network to cameras on the street."

This article was originally published at Kable.

Kable's GC weekly is a free email newsletter covering the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. To register click here.

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.