Feeds

Netherlands raises €2.7m on 2.6GHz

Dutch auction not a Dutch auction

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

The Netherlands has raised just over €2.7m selling off its LTE-ready spectrum - a derisory sum, and no one seems to want WiMAX at all.

The auction has been running since Monday, and finished up with five companies buying FDD spectrum ideally suited to LTE deployments. Incumbents KPN, Vodafone and T-Mobile got 50MHz between them, while newcomers Ziggo 4 and Tele 2 snagged 80MHz of bandwidth. 69.7MHz of TDD spectrum, ideally suited to WiMAX, lies unsold.

The incumbents wanted more, and even went to court last week in an attempt to get the auction delayed while they lobbied to have the 55MHz cap on their combined bidding lifted, but without success as the government was keen to bring in at least two new entrants. Ziggo 4 is a pairing of two cable TV operators, Ziggo and UPC, which want to get into the mobile business, while Tele2 is already there but wants to get into the Netherlands.

The 130MHz sold is all paired spectrum - divided into non-contiguous blocks to enable one to be used for sending and the other for receiving - which is what LTE needs. The Dutch reserved the centre of the 2.6GHz band for TDD (time-division duplex) systems, of which WiMAX is the poster child, but are now considering the best way to get shot of the block no one seems to want.

Not that bidders were clamouring to get hold of the rest of the spectrum – Finland raised €3.8m for its 2.6GHz, though €1.47m of that was for the TDD licence, so cutting that out the revenue generated by both countries was about the same, despite Finland having only a third of the population.

The Netherlands did restrict existing operators to 55MHz, which will have depressed the price, and there’s a licence requirement to roll out within two years so bidders will have had to keep some cash back for that. But mostly the price paid is indicative of operators being reluctant to splash out on radio spectrum when no one knows quite what it’s for or thus how to make money out of it. None of this bodes well for Ofcom's super-auction next year. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Consumers agree to give up first-born child for free Wi-Fi – survey
This Herod network's ace – but crap reception in bullrushes
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
New EU digi-commish struggles with concepts of net neutrality
Oettinger all about the infrastructure – but not big on substance
PEAK IPV4? Global IPv6 traffic is growing, DDoS dying, says Akamai
First time the cache network has seen drop in use of 32-bit-wide IP addresses
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.