Feeds

More vultures attack Compellent

Ravening lawyers' class action ambulance-chasing

Security for virtualized datacentres

Two more legal firms have joined in the hunt to extract cash from Compellent and deliver it to aggrieved investors with a modest emolument going to the lawyers for their expenses.

Robins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is looking for aggrieved investors to join in its class action and alleges:

...throughout the Class Period, defendants failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's true financial condition, business and prospects. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants failed to disclose: (i) that the Company was experiencing increasing competition which was forcing it to dramatically lower prices in order to continue to generate sales in line with internal expectations; (ii) that as a result of increased competition, the Company was being forced to raise expenditures associated with acquiring new customers far in excess of internal expectations; (iii) that the Company was experiencing significant issues with its sales force which were further complicating and exacerbating the negative impact of slowing sales; and (iv) that, based on the foregoing, defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company, its prospects and growth.

Izzard Nobel LLP is also seeking class action status in a lawsuit and alleges:

The Complaint charges that Compellent and certain of its officers and executives violated federal securities laws. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose the following material adverse facts: (i) that Compellent was experiencing increasing competition which was forcing it to dramatically lower prices in order to continue to generate sales in line with internal expectations; (ii) that as a result of increased competition, the Company was being forced to raise expenditures associated with acquiring new customers far in excess of internal expectations; (iii) that Compellent was experiencing significant issues with its sales force which were further complicating and exacerbating the negative impact of slowing sales; and (iv) that, based on the foregoing, defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company, its prospects and growth.

Strange - it looks like a cut 'n paste job from the previous bunch of lawyers. Are they acting in concert?

Imagine the job of Compellent's legal office as it gets the eDiscovery requests winging through the door from three firms of lawyers. Excuse me, could we go through your e-mails and documents to look for evidence that you've been deceiving investors and give us a nice fat fee if we can prove it in court? Oh, and by the way, you can't say no.

Perhaps they could compare notes with STEC's similarly besieged lawyer's office and share best practice?

Compellent has been directing inquiries on the issue to its Investor Relations people who weren't available when we called. We expect them to say that they are cooperating with the lawyers and nothing more. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Symantec backs out of Backup Exec: Plans to can appliance in Jan
Will still provide support to existing customers
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.