The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple updates MacBook Pro notebooks

Nvidia Optimus technology on board?

Updated Apple has updated its MacBook Pro laptop line, promising not only faster processors and better graphics but also a longer battery life.

The 15.4in Pro gets a choice of 2.4GHz and 2.53GHz Core i5s, both with 3MB of L3 cache. The machines can make use of the on-CPU graphics core or Nvidia's GeForce GT 330M 256MB GPU, which is also installed in the machines.

Apple MacBook Pro family

"Apple’s automatic graphics switching determines which graphics processor an application needs and switches instantly between processors to deliver peak performance and long battery life," the company claimed, but it's clearly using Nvidia's Optimus technology.

There's also a 15in Pro with a 2.66GHz, 4MB L3 Core i7 and 512MB of VRam connected to its GT 330M. The 17in Pro also has a 512MB GT 330M, but only a 2.53GHz Core i5 CPU.

The 13.3in Pros still use Core 2 Duo processors, upgraded to 2.4GHz and 2.6GHz, and fitted with Nvidia's GeForce 320M integrated graphics.

All the MacBook Pros have at least 4GB of 1067MHz DDR 3 memory, slot-load 8x multi-layer DVD writers, 802.11n Wi-Fi, Gigabit Ethernet, a Firewire 800 port, two or more USB 2.0 ports and an SD card slot. They have Mini DisplayPort connectors for external monitors, and the 17in machine has an ExpressCard 34 slot.

Prices range from £999 for the 2.4GHz 13.3in machine to £1899 for the 17in Pro. Some models are available now, others within five days. ®

Update
No, it's not Optimus

You're no fool...

...so fortunately there's still Dell and Windows 7 for smart folks like you!

1
0

Worthless

Clearly a large segment of the population wants small (< 12") laptops, hence their sales in PC-land.

Come on Steve, you can keep your Core iWhatevers. MacBooks are already fast enough. Give us some 1.3GHz CULV goodness.

1
0

But that they were

Cheap that is.

0
0

no.

*headdesk*

there's no such thing as 'too much at that size' (until your eyes become inadequate to actually resolve the theoretically-possible detail, which is a point much higher than 1920x1200 at 15"). Higher resolution at the same screen size simply improves sharpness. It doesn't 'make everything smaller', unless your OS is crap; you just set the DPI setting correctly and you get everything the size it ought to be, but sharper than if the resolution were lower...

OS X is supposed to be reasonably resolution-independent, from all I've read.

0
0

higher rez - 1650x1050?

you can get 1650x1050 as a BTO option on the 15" now which seems like a sensible rez... 1920x1200 is just too much at that size.

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Apple cored: Samsung sells 10 million Galaxy S4 in a month
Beware of South Koreans bearing Android
Microsoft reveals Xbox One, the console that can read your heartbeat
Upgrades Live service – and no always-on requirement
US boffin builds 32-way Raspberry Pi cluster
Beowulf cluster built for the price of a single PC
Is the next-gen console war already One?
Microsoft’s new Xbox - and more
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
STROKE this mouse to make apps POP, says Microsoft
Windows 8 Start button comes to Redmond's rodents
Nintendo throws flaming legal barrel at YouTubing fans
All your walk-through vid revenue are belong to us

Hands on with Hyper-V 3.0 and virtual machine movement

Our award-winning Regcasts have teamed up with training provider QA for the deepest of deep dives into Hyper-V, including a live demo.

Understand VM movement - just click to play, or go here for a bigger version.