Feeds

OCZ prods Z-Drive to go faster

2TB and upgradable flash modules

Boost IT visibility and business value

OCZ has boosted the speed and doubled the capacity of its solid state Z-Drive as well as making it upgradable with interchangeable NAND modules.

The existing Z-Drive 1 is a PCI-e connected 256GB-1TB solid state drive (SSD) with good performance: up to 800GB/sec read, 750GB/sec write and a 500MB/sec sustained write speed for the 1TB model. One model used single level cell (SLC) flash but the others MLC (multi-level cell).

This second generation Z-Drive has a 512GB to 2TB capacity range, all of it using MLC flash. Its 1TB performance figures are up to 1.4GB/sec read and write, and 950MB/sec sustained write. These are good numbers.

OCZ Z-Drive R2 SSD

We can compare performance roughly with Fusion-io and LSI PCIe SSD. A 512GB Z-Drive does up to 1.3GB/sec read, up to 1GB/sec write and up to 550GB/sec sustained writes. LSI's SSS6200 has a 300GB of SLC flash capacity and its sustained bandwidth is 1.5GB/sec for reads and 1.2GB/sec for writes. The Fusion-io 640GB SMLC flash IoDrive Duo offers 1.4GB/sec read bandwidth and 1.0GB/sec write bandwidth (32K packet size).

The Z-Drive is slower than both the Fusion-io and LSI products but its capacity does go up to 2TB with the p88 product. There are also p84 and m84 products which have a 256MB-1TB capacity range.

The first iteration of the Z-Drive used permanent surface-mounted NAND. Z-Drive R2 NAND modules are carried on a daughter card, with four hot-swappable modules. These can be replaced, a feature which OCZ says is unique. Duff modules can be replaced in the field and hopefully when higher-capacity modules are available they could be used to replaced the existing ones. Today's 2TB Z-Drive could then likely become a 4TB one

OCZ says its the only bootable PCIe SSD available as well. The product has 8 PCIe lanes and either 4 or 8 SATA lanes. It has either an 8-way or 4-way RAID 0 configuration and uses Indilinx controllers and a 512KB cache. These are standard specs - OEMs can get customised versions.

There will be a three-year warranty. OCZ says the product is going to enter mass-production and isn't releasing pricing and specific availability data yet. Hexus speculates that the 2TB version could cost around £4,000. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Object storage bods Exablox: RAID is dead, baby. RAID is dead
Bring your own disks to its object appliances
Nimble's latest mutants GORGE themselves on unlucky forerunners
Crossing Sandy Bridges without stopping for breath
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.