Feeds

Reg readers feel the squeeze in 2010 IT budgets

Calling all belt-tighteners - how is it for you?

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

"If there's a harder way, we'll find it"

Other comments included:

As staff leave they are not replaced, except management - they are always replaced.

We have had to lay off all temporary contractors- even those whose presence is required to finish the projects which will in actuality lower our staffing and budgetary needs.

These kinds of cuts can be self-defeating, to be sure, and we received plenty more examples of short-term savings that will almost certainly result in higher costs or worse business results down the road:

The president of the company thinks he's a fairly technically savvy guy. From one sentence to the next he says, ‘I want to put this new application in the cloud computing realm, but the data can't leave the country, and I want it to have five nine's uptime. Oh and do you think we can use those pizza box servers we've just retired?’ These 'pizza box' servers are 6 year old **** garbage that were decommissioned for very good reasons.

We have decided to move our equipment 900 miles south where the electricity is cheaper, the move will cost millions but we will save thousands.

Some of the comments were downright scary…

Less redundancy. When our primary sever failed, we switched to our backup, but never repaired or replaced the primary, leaving us without a backup.

…while others were plaintive:

How about no budget for IT? Things are fixed by cannibalization or emergency purchases. We have re-purposed half the equipment to get more from what we have. We have switched to GNU/Linux on the server and use the server to provide Debian desktops to the slow XP machines using xrdp. We have not enough RAM and storage. We even moved drives from one server to another. Requests for RAM and storage have gone unanswered. I suppose there might be hope for a 2010 budget but I see no light at the end of the tunnel.

I am using standard PCs for some services like cloning, mainly because there is not enough storage on the proper server. Apart from cannibalization, the only spares I have is some cable and connectors, CD drives and floppies. I have no Ethernet cards, wireless access points (on which we depend), or disc drives in case of failure. I am using storage on the server with an incomplete tape backup. I do not even have blank tape…

Thanks for letting me vent. I needed that.

We also asked whether respondents’ organisations are using IT to cut costs overall and, as you can see from the chart, about half of our respondents agreed that this was the case. One respondent reported:

Chart 2

My company is privately-owned, so they have maintained a rather even keel on dumb things to save money. Bonuses and raises were nonexistent and the 401(k) match was zeroed, and may not come back for awhile. And we're being packed into clustered-desk work areas to reduce rent, but I'm a software engineer who went hired-gun last year so I'm used to being well-paid and shittily-officed and it's not a big deal.

We did receive some positive feedback on management moves. This one was probably the best so far:

I'm actually quite impressed by our executive management, they tend to go for IT systems that improve services and reduce risk. Not that they don't consider cost issues, but that isn't the primary driver.

Many of the answers were pretty funny, and we’ll throw together a posting with those soon – we all need as many laughs as we can get during these tough times. But we’ll leave you with this one. Presumably it’s their data centre or corporate mission statement…

If there is a harder way, we'll find it. There is no reason, it’s just our policy!

The survey covers a wide range of issues ranging from server spending to virtualization to facilities concerns, but at the heart of it is an attempt to understand how real-world customers view the major x86 server vendors, and how the vendors compare on various technology and support criteria. We’re still running it, so if you’re someone who is intimately involved (in a clean way) with x86 server management or selection in your organization, we’d love to hear what you have to say.

We guarantee your anonymity and won’t try to sell you anything. You can check out the survey here. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Oracle hires former SAP exec for cloudy push
'We know Larry said cloud was gibberish, and insane, and idiotic, but...'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.