Feeds

Apple, Google, world+dog named in mobile patent suit

Shocker: may not be baseless

Security for virtualized datacentres

Apple, Google, Motorola, HTC, and 18 other top mobile-tech firms have been hit with yet another wide-ranging patent infringement lawsuit.

Unlike a similarly broad-brush suit filed earlier this month by the obscure Texas firm of SmartPhone Technologies LLC against Apple, Motolora, RIM, and others, the plaintiff in this case is a company that appears to actually exist: MicroUnity of Santa Clara, California.

The 38-page complaint alleges that the 22 defendants have infringed upon 14 MicroUnity patents covering a variety of mobile-processor technologies. Of the 14, two - one concerning floating-point operations and another covering group data operations - were granted just last month. The earliest, which deals with microprocessor buffer design, dates from 1998.

Among the 22 alleged infringers, Qualcomm, Samsung, and Texas Instruments are alleged to be in violation of MicroUnity patents in their processors. AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint are alleged to violate patents in their support of infringing phones, while Apple, Google, HTC, Motorola, Nokia, and others are alleged to violate patents in their phones or other devices. Specifically named in the suit, for example, are Apple's iPhone 3GS and iPod Touch, Google's Nexus One, and Nokia's N900.

MicroUnity is no stranger to patent-infringment lawsuits. According to the company's website, they reached litigation settlements with Intel and Dell in 2005 and with Sony and AMD in 2007. MicroUnity did not immediately respond to our requests for comment.

Also according to the MicroUnity website, the company's prime area of current operations is the development of what they call "a new generation of broadband microprocessor innovations" known as BroadMX (PDF), a "programming model and synthesizable hardware library that makes broadband algorithms - including 4G wireless, HD video, and 3D graphics - practical to implement and upgrade in software."

As is standard practice in such patent-infringment lawsuits, the complaint was filed in the plaintiff-friendly US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, home to such recent patent-infringement filings as the aforementioned SmartPhone Technologies suit, VirnetX's pair of lawsuits against Microsoft, and BetaNet's questionable complaint against Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Oracle, IBM, SAP, and a dozen other companies.

Palm, by the way, was also named as a defendant in the MicroUnity lawsuit - yet another headache for a company that is enduring both bad financial news and sloppily reported rumors. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
FCC, Google cast eye over millimetre wireless
The smaller the wave, the bigger 5G's chances of success
It's even GRIMMER up North after MEGA SKY BROADBAND OUTAGE
By 'eck! Eccles cake production thrown into jeopardy
Mobile coverage on trains really is pants
You thought it was just *insert your provider here*, but now we have numbers
Don't mess with Texas ('cos it's getting Google Fiber and you're not)
A bit late, but company says 1Gbps Austin network almost ready to compete with AT&T
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.