Feeds

Is StorSpeed grinding to a halt?

Filer cacher startup drops the ball

Security for virtualized datacentres

The future of filer cacher StorSpeed appears unclear after it emerged that key execs had left the firm amidst rumours it failed to actually shift any kit.

It launched its SP5000 caching appliance last October. This was juicy hardware with up to six clustered 2U caching nodes featuring FPGA go-faster hardware and solid state drives (SSD) or small form-factor SAS drives, controlled by software said to be application-aware. The SSD version was said to support 350,000 IOPS. As an inline cache it competed with Avere's FTX multi-tiered filer accelerator.

StorSpeed was founded in 2007 by president and CEO Mark Cree and Greg Dahl, the company's business development VP, and laid in $13m of A-round funding. That seems to have been that on the funding front, and this sum, for what it's worth, doesn't sound like a lot of cash to develop a hardware and software product from scratch.

StorSpeed's website lists the current investors as Covera Ventures, El Dorado Ventures, Palomar Ventures and Vesbridge. Two other VC firms were involved in 2007 but seem to have disappeared along the way.

One account, coming indirectly from former employees, is that not a single system was sold. A second account said that StorSpeed did not focus a lot on software originally and its hardware had problems that could not be fixed. We're told that the original hardware VP of engineering and co-founder left late last year. A new VP of engineering for software left a few weeks ago as did Mark Cree, the founding CEO, we're told.

This account is backed up by scanning LinkedIn entries. Mark Cree's entry says he left StorSpeed in February this year. Previously he'd spent five years as a venture or technology partner with two of StorSpeed's VC backers, El Dorado Ventures and Vesbridge.

Another LinkedIn-listed StorSpeed ex-employee is Spencer Shepler, the chief technology officer, describing himself now as the "Ex-CTO of Ex-Storspeed."

Peter Amirkhan, StorSpeed's Sales VP, left in February. Michael Tibbets lists his Director of Software Engineering position at StorSpeed as past employment on his LinkedIn entry, with it finishing this month.

Calls to StorSpeed's HQ are met with a voicemail response, with no call back, and it has given no statement.®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Symantec backs out of Backup Exec: Plans to can appliance in Jan
Will still provide support to existing customers
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.