Feeds

Plan for top-level pornography domain gets reprieve

ICANN to reconsider .xxx denial

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

A plan to create a specific area of the Internet for pornography has been given a reprieve by a distinguished panel of judges.

The panelists - who included a former International Court of Justice judge - told Internet overseeing body ICANN in a majority decision that it was wrong to reject an application for the top-level domain dot-xxx three years ago.

That decision made by ICANN’s Board in March 2007 was “not consistent with the application of neutral, objective, and fair documented policy,” the panel concluded. It also decided in favor of the company behind the dot-xxx application, ICM Registry, in three of the remaining four issues under dispute and ordered ICANN to pick up fees and expenses totaling $475,000.

As a result of the panel’s declaration, the ICANN Board will now reconsider the dot-xxx application and decision at its meeting in Nairobi next month, opening the way for dot-xxx’s possible inclusion into the Internet’s “root.”

However, the ICANN Board is not obliged to adopt the panel’s findings, and an initial response by its management made it clear that the organization is keeping its options open. CEO Rod Beckstrom, blogging about the decision, pointed out that the panel decision was not unanimous and that there had been significant community opposition to the application.

That post drew immediate criticism from some in the Internet community who felt ICANN was attempting to backtrack from the panel decision, something Beckstrom subsequently refuted. “I was not involved in the history of this issue so I have no vested interest. I was trying to highlight the possible things that can happen now. In too many cases, people act like everything was an easy decision.”

Beckstrom pointed out that it is the Board that will ultimately decide what to do and that his job as CEO is to ensure ICANN’s staff do the best job possible in providing the Board with the objective advice and information it needs.

In that respect, ICANN’s chairman, Peter Dengate Thrush, is now in an interesting position. As chair, he will direct Board discussions over the panel’s report, but prior to his chairmanship he was one of five Board members that voted against the decision to reject dot-xxx, making a strong public statement against the vote and noting the “particularly thin argument” that the Board made in rejecting dot-xxx. It was this same argument that was also rejected by the independent review panel.

ICM Registry chairman Stuart Lawley hailed the declaration as a victory not just for the company but also “the ICANN model of private sector management of the Domain Name System.” And remarkably, considering it lost the dispute, ICANN’s Beckstrom also recognized that the case was successful “from an outside perspective,” telling us that it had put back an issue in front of the ICANN Board that it previously had no intention of revisiting.

The man who headed the Board at the time of the vote, former ICANN chairman Vint Cerf, told us that he was disappointed with the result since he agreed with the dissenting opinion and reasoning of one of the three panelists. Nonetheless, he welcomed the process itself. “I think the fact of the IRP (Independent Review Process) is important to ICANN processes so regardless of the outcome, it strengthens ICANN because it is a process that allows response to complaints.”

Security for virtualized datacentres

Next page: What was decided

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Consumers agree to give up first-born child for free Wi-Fi – survey
This Herod network's ace – but crap reception in bullrushes
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
New EU digi-commish struggles with concepts of net neutrality
Oettinger all about the infrastructure – but not big on substance
PEAK IPV4? Global IPv6 traffic is growing, DDoS dying, says Akamai
First time the cache network has seen drop in use of 32-bit-wide IP addresses
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.