Nokia pulls the plug on wireless payment handset
While China Unicom builds new ones
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Nokia has scrapped its third NFC handset, the 6216, which never got launched despite being scheduled for last year and despite China Unicom's plans for an NFC launch.
The 6216 would have been Nokia's third NFC handset, but the first to have handed control of the payment system to the operator's SIM through the Single Wire Protocol (SWP): exactly the architecture that China Unicom will be deploying in the next six months, as NFC World reports.
"We felt the quality of the consumer experience was not what it needed to be," Nokia told NFC World when asked about the cancellation of the 6216, before confirming that the company was still committed to the idea, just not the architecture that gives operators control.
Near Field Communications (NFC) is a system that allows a phone handset to be used as a proximity-payment system, waved near a reader for small-value transactions such as public transport for example. Those compliant with the NFC Forum's specification can operate through induced power (so work on a battery-dead phone) and are compatible with existing ticketing systems such as London's Oyster card.
But wireless communications are only half the story - such a system also needs a safe place to store the current balance and the various certificates necessary to secure the system. The obvious place for that is inside the SIM, and operators lobbied hard for the SWP standard which would connect a SIM-based NFC system to the outside world, but despite being a standard for more than two years SWP-compatible handsets still don't exist in significant numbers.
Companies like Nokia would much rather see the secure module embedded in the phone, tying the user to the handset rather than the SIM, and operators haven't provided any discouragement.
So the 6216 would have been a significant handset, if it had been launched, which Nokia has now admitted won't happen.
Which is a shame as China Unicom has announced it will be launching an NFC-Forum-compatible service, based on SWP, later this year. That's going to have to compete with China Mobile's, incompatible, RF SIM system, but as China's second network operator Unicom still has more than 125 million subscribers - enough, one might think, to make Nokia think again about the 6216. ®
COMMENTS
Nokia Obstructionism?
Guess there is a lot of money to the group that processes the payments. If it is neutral, then Nokia and other handheld manufacturers miss out on the dough. If they step in the middle, ostensibly providing better QoS, then they stand to grab a little of it. Of course that is at the cost of holding up the technology for the consumers. NFC payment is going to happen, and basically they are not going to control the market as long as the credit card companies, mobile network operators, and other mobile vendors are still breathing...and naturally all grabbing for a piece of the pie at the same time. QoS my arse. Pull the other one Nokia.
Actually fast enough for transport ticketing
I was seriously involved in the development and testing of an NFC-based transportation system and I can attest that transportation transactions with a phone are fast enough (i.e. less than 250ms). First, the SWP subsystem in the phone adds a mimimum amount of overhead (5-10%). Second, SIM cards that support SWP are typically faster than comparable full-size contactless JavaCards, because SIM cards are powered by the phone's battery while a contactless card relies only on the power transmitted by the reader.
Now it does not means that we are home free. Native transportation cards are still a lost faster than JavaCards (typically under 100ms). However, 250ms is "fast enough" and integrating the transportation application in a mobile phone opens many interesting use cases.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Data control in the cloud
Cloud based data management
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
