Feeds

X2 triplex multicopter prototype suffers gearbox snag

Still hoping to pop can of Osprey whup-ass this year

Protecting against web application threats using SSL

Updated Chopper globocorp Sikorsky has suffered technical hitches in development of its potentially revolutionary (cough) X2 multicopter, which is intended to administer a stinging technical bitchslap to the famous V-22 "Osprey" tiltrotor from rival firm Boeing.

The X2 demonstrator airborne for the first time above New York State

Let's get this spin machine off the ground.

Flight International reports that a gearbox problem was detected during ground tests in December, just before the triplex whirlybird was due to take off for a flight test at 150 knots. The X2, which first flew with all its capabilities installed last July, is gradually working its way up to the full design speed of 250 knots - much faster than a normal copter, and noticeably better than the Osprey.

Apparently the gearbox snag has now been sorted out, but some lower-speed flights will now have to be repeated. However Sikorsky test pilot Kevin Bredenbeck told Flight that he expects to hit 250 knots "by the end of the year".

The X2 works by the use of two main rotor sets spinning in opposite directions. This avoids one of the problems suffered by ordinary helicopters attempting to go fast, the issue of "retreating blade stall" - where the backwards-going blade briefly becomes almost stationary with respect to the air it cleaves owing to the aircraft's forward speed, so losing lift on one side of the rotor disc. An X2 or other stacked-rotor copter has forwardgoing blades on both sides, however.

That's just one of the snags to be solved, though. As the retreating blade slows, so the forward-going blade tips tend to go supersonic as the helicopter accelerates. In general this is hard to deal with, as most choppers spin their rotors at a fixed rpm.

But the X2 has variable speed equipment, allowing it to slow the blades' spin as it speeds up and so keep the blade tips safely subsonic. It also has modern superstiff low-drag rotors and active damping tech, which Sikorsky hope will quell the violent vibration which bedevilled previous efforts along these lines.

As the twin main rotors counteract each other's torque, an X2 needs no side-thruster on its tail for steering. This means that it can put a forward-driving propeller there instead, to provide the extra thrust necessary to reach high speeds. A previous attempt at an X2-like aircraft, the XH-59A demonstrator, used extra strap-on jet engines instead: but these made the XH-59 overly heavy and complex, and a fuel hog besides. Sikorsky believe that their tail prop driven from the X2's single turbine is the way forward - smaller X2 craft of the future could also be single-engined and thus simpler and cheaper to operate than tiltrotors.

So far the machine has flown at only 106 knots, however, a speed which even crummy old normal 'copters can surpass. However, according to Bredenbeck, the active-vibe-damping kit hasn't even been needed yet, which should indicate plenty of room left in the X2's flight envelope.

Meanwhile the Osprey has finally entered frontline service with the US Marines after a long and painful gestation. Initial operations in Iraq's Anbar province were unconvincing to the tiltrotor's critics, as Anbar had pretty much calmed down by the time it arrived. However the Osprey is now in the thick of serious fighting in Afghanistan, reportedly without any particular problems.

Barring any further tech hiccups, this year should see which is to be victor in the souped-up rotorcraft stakes: tiltrotor or triplex multicopter. ®

Update

We had thought that the Osprey could only go at 240 knots, or 230 in the case of the spec-ops version, based on the normally reliable Globalsecurity.org's figures for the V-22. However an Osprey pilot writes in to tell us that the tiltrotor, following software changes, can now do 270 knots in level flight - so even if the X2 performs to spec it will not be as fast as a V-22.

Sikorsky would no doubt still defend their idea on grounds of reduced complexity and potential to be single-engined rather than twin. They would also, perhaps, point out the Osprey's apparent tendency to melt and buckle the flight decks of US warships with its hot exhausts, which isn't an issue with the X2. But it doesn't seem especially likely that the X2 will snatch away the V-22's speed crown.

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
PORTAL TO ELSEWHERE scried in small galaxy far, far away
Supermassive black hole dominates titchy star formation
Boffins say they've got Lithium batteries the wrong way around
Surprises at the nano-scale mean our ideas about how they charge could be all wrong
Edge Research Lab to tackle chilly LOHAN's final test flight
Our US allies to probe potential Vulture 2 servo freeze
Europe prepares to INVADE comet: Rosetta landing site chosen
No word yet on whether backup site is labelled 'K'
Cracked it - Vulture 2 power podule fires servos for 4 HOURS
Pixhawk avionics juice issue sorted, onwards to Spaceport America
Archaeologists and robots on hunt for more Antikythera pieces
How much of the world's oldest computer can they find?
Who wants to be there as history is made at the launch of our LOHAN space project?
Two places available in the chase plane above the desert
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.