Feeds

Contest offers $100,000 for smartphone, browser hacks

Pwn2Own the iPhone

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

An annual hacking contest that has made mincemeat of security on both Mac and Windows computers will set its sights on smartphones and browsers with as much as $100,000 in awards next month.

Now in its fourth year, the Pwn2Own competition will award $60,000 for exploits that successfully penetrate Apple's iPhone 3GS, Research in Motion's Blackberry Bold 9700, a Nokia device running the most recent version of Symbian and a Motorola phone running Google's Android. Each mobile attack that results in code execution "with little to no user-interaction" will fetch $15,000.

Contestants will also be able to take home the device they pwn and will qualify for other remuneration from TippingPoint's Zero Day Initiative, the security firm sponsoring the challenge.

"The increased presence and capabilities of smart phones has brought with it the same security issues and attention traditionally reserved for non hand-held platforms," ZDI's Aaron Portnoy wrote in announcing this year's rules. "The data stored and communicated across these devices is increasing in value to attackers."

The Pwn2Own contest has thrived at proving to world+dog that with the proper financial incentive, virtually any internet-facing software will fall to real-world exploits. The extremely low number of attacks that target Macs in the wild has led many fans to claim the platform is more resistant to malicious hacks. Critics maintain the lack of successful OS X exploits is merely the result of its significantly lower market share, roughly 8 percent worldwide, compared with around 90 percent for Windows.

Within hours at last year's Pwn2Own, the three most widely used browsers suffered fatal blows that allowed hackers to remotely run code on the underlying machines. Included in the wreckage was a brand-new MacBook Pro, which was awarded to researcher Charlie Miller for his exploit of a fully patched version of Safari running on Leopard, at the time Apple's most recent OS.

It was one of two attacks that successfully breached Apple security that day.

Miller also received $5,000 for confidentially reporting the underlying bug to TippingPoint. The firm used the technical details to add signatures to intrusion prevention systems that detect the attack and also provided details to Apple so the bug could be fixed.

Chrome was the only browser targeted in the competition not to fall. A few weeks later, Google disclosed its browser was susceptible to the same vulnerability a German grad student used to attack Safari.

While last year's Pwn2Own was a grim day for browser security, all five smartphones that were targeted during the same competition remained unscathed. This time around, contest organizers are throwing more money at the platform, with as much as $60,000 in prizes. Awards for browser hacks, by contrast, will fetch a maximum of $40,000.

In a major departure from last year, each target will be removed from competition once it has been successfully compromised. That introduces the possibility that participants with a reliable exploit may not qualify if the browser or phone has already fallen to another contestant.

"It might make people not want to participate, because I'm not inclined to go through the trouble of writing an exploit if I'm not going to win for sure," Miller, who is principal analyst at Independent Security Evaluators, told The Register. "Don't get me wrong, I still think its by far the coolest contest all year." During the 2008 contest, he won a MacBook Air and $10,000.

Another big difference this year is the size of the cash prizes. The $15,000 award for smartphone exploits is 50 percent higher than last year. Browser exploits will pay $10,000, double the amount in 2009.

The contest will run from March 24 through March 27 and is designed to reflect the difficulty of targeting different platforms. On Day 1 the pairings are:

  • IE 8 on Windows 7
  • Firefox 3 on Windows 7
  • Google Chrome 4 on Windows 7
  • Safari 4 on MacOS X Snow Leopard

On Day 2, they will be:

  • IE 7 on Windows Vista
  • Firefox 3 on Windows Vista
  • Chrome 4 on Windows Vista
  • Safari 4 on Snow Leopard

And on Day 3:

  • IE 7 on Windows XP
  • Firefox 3 on Windows XP
  • Chrome 4 on Windows XP
  • Safari 4 on Snow Leopard

Once again, El Reg will bring all the color and highlights of the competition from the CanSecWest Security Conference in Vancouver, British Columbia. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Hackers thrash Bash Shellshock bug: World races to cover hole
Update your gear now to avoid early attacks hitting the web
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.