Feeds

SpinVox carcass laid bare in final accounts

And you will know us by the trail of our debt

Top three mobile application threats

The Mechanical Turk

SpinVox provided voice to text services, and is best known for its voicemail to SMS service. The company had 15,000 retail customers, but sought to expand into deals with large mobile phone networks, making the service available to millions of users.

SpinVox claimed the translation process was largely performed by AI-based software. The claim puzzled speech experts, who said that the state-of-art systems could not convert voicemail in noisy situations with sufficient accuracy to be economically viable.

Internet postings suggested that SpinVox employed call centres to perform the bulk of the translation. This suggestion was not corroborated until a report in late July by the BBC's Rory Cellan Jones, who also reported on unpaid suppliers.

Insiders speaking to The Register provided more detail. We also revealed how prestigious non-exec Patricia Russo joined and left almost immediately, how the loans had a very short fuse, and how SpinVox's patent portfolio contained no speech IP, but did describe (in great detail) a Mechanical Turk:

"Because human operators are used instead of machine transcription, voicemails are converted accurately, intelligently, appropriately and succinctly into text messages (SMS/MMS)," founder Daniel Doulton wrote in a 2004 patent filing.

Any prudent investor, we noted last year, would have asked how many staff SpinVox employed, and how many messages they process, to determine its cost base and scalability. A company performing translation largely based on software would have been able to scale to meet the demands of millions of users, but one largely dependent on call centre staff, as SpinVox turned out to be, would have been constrained by wage costs and a limited pool of qualified labour.

Now it's all over for SpinVox, bar the counting - who won and who lost out. Staff who held ordinary shares (in some cases, instead of wages) receive nothing.

Audited accounts still need to be filed at UK Companies House. ®

Top three mobile application threats

More from The Register

next story
A black box for your SUITCASE: Now your lost luggage can phone home – quite literally
Breakfast in London, lunch in NYC, and your clothes in Peru
Broadband Secretary of SHEEP sensationally quits Cabinet
Maria Miller finally resigns over expenses row
Skype pimps pro-level broadcast service
Playing Cat and Mouse with the media
EE dismisses DATA-BURNING glitch with Orange Mail app
Bug quietly slurps PAYG credit - yet EE denies it exists
Like Google, Comcast might roll its own mobile voice network
Says anything's possible if regulators approve merger with Time Warner
Turnbull leaves Australia's broadband blackspots in the dark
New Statement of Expectations to NBN Co offers get-out clauses for blackspot builds
Facebook claims 100 MEEELLION active users in India
Who needs China when you've got the next billion in your sights?
Facebook splats in-app chat, whacks brats into crack yakety-yak app
Jibber-jabbering addicts turfed out just as Zuck warned
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.