Feeds

TPC adds power suckage to benchmarks

Performance (per watt) anxiety

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

If server makers are already anxious about how big their iron is, they'll now also need to start worrying about how cool they are.

The Transaction Processing Council is a consortium of server, operating system, and database software makers that steers the development, running, auditing, and reporting of a suite of online transaction processing and data warehousing benchmark tests. The results of these tests are used for one-upmanship by vendors and as part of purchasing decisions by IT departments, and now TPC is adding another set of metrics for them to take into consideration: energy.

The TPC-C OLTP test, which has been in use since 1992 and which is in its fifth revision, is arguably the most popular system-level benchmark test in the history of the computer industry. The TPC-C test is a collection of different workloads that are associated with the data processing needed to run a warehouse - a physical warehouse with forklifts and pallets, not one crammed with data being tickled by SQL. The workload includes order processing, inventory, and other operations, and the TPC-C metric is the number of new orders a database can process per minute while supporting the other work.

Like All TPC tests, all of the hardware and software used in the TPC-C test has to be itemized, and vendors have to provide list prices for all of the components as well as discounts that a typical customer would get. The results have to be audited by experts certified by the TPC, and both performance and price/performance metrics are required.

The more modern TPC-E test, which was launched in March 2007, simulates the data processing of an online stock brokerage, and uses real data along with customers that are simulated based on census data from the United States and Canada.

The TPC-E test was designed to be easier to implement, but harder to game. And as you might expect, it has not exactly been popular with server and systems software makers - even though they designed it by committee starting in 2005 and were expected to ratify it in 2005. Only 29 systems in three years have been tested, which makes the TPC-E test basically useless.

The other test that is getting an energy component is the TPC-H data warehousing test, which tests how well or poorly a system or a cluster of systems can process ad hoc queries.

The TPC-Energy spec is a an optional component of these three tests, not a requirement, says Mike Nikolaiev, who is chairman of the committee that drafted the spec and who gets his paycheck as the manager of the systems performance group at Hewlett-Packard. While the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation has a larger family of benchmarks, a number of which measure server performance and a few which have an energy component, the three TPC tests and their energy metric overlay are distinct in that they require pricing on the systems and independent auditing.

"We want to make sure we have a level playing field here," Nikolaiev said. And in a possible good sign, the 22 members of the consortium who were around to vote on the spec (there are 24 members in total, including all the key server and operating system/database players) unanimously ratified the spec. "That has never happened with a TPC benchmark before," according to Nikolaiev.

The TPC-Energy spec shows vendors how they need to attach power meters to the systems under test, and it will not only look at the electricity consumed by the entire system under test, but also examine the idle power of the same system when it is not processing transactions but kept in a state of being able to process the first transaction.

To keep vendors from gaming the test, all elements of the system under test (including any funky cooling elements) have to be commercially available, and vendors have to measure air intake on the system racks and keep an ambient intake temperature of 20 degrees Celsius - no super-chilling the data center to allow a machine to do more work per watt.

Energy use is measured in three parts of the system - the application servers, the database servers, and the storage systems - so vendors can show the relative efficiency of different components. The TPC has also come up with a software toolset called the Energy Measuring System that all system testers will use to monitor energy usage and collect data during the test. This means the collection of energy data will be absolutely consistent across different vendors.

Nikolaiev is hopeful that the TPC-Energy overlay to the TPC tests will be popular, and with vendors looking for every angle they can find to peddle systems, it seems reasonable that a different kind of arms race will start based on performance per watt instead of just performance.

"The main vendors will jump in right away," says Nikolaiev. "And this will create a lot of peer pressure."

The lack of peer pressure and the closing of loopholes in the TPC-E test has doomed that better benchmark to the back benches after an initial boost of enthusiastic jawboning from the server makers. HP is going to be putting out TPC-Energy specs soon, and Nikolaiev says others will start rolling out results in the next couple of months. He expects server makers to run double tests, pitting solid state disks against disk drives within the same server and running the same software stack to show why SSDs are worth all that extra money. No doubt the first tests will come on systems using new x64, Itanium, and Power7 processors that that are expected in February and March. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Oracle hires former SAP exec for cloudy push
'We know Larry said cloud was gibberish, and insane, and idiotic, but...'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.