Cyber sleuth sees China's fingerprints on 'Aurora' attacks
Jury still out
A security researcher who reverse engineered code used to attack Google and other large companies has said he found what he believes are the fingerprints of Chinese hackers.
The telltale sign, according to Joe Stewart, director of SecureWorks' Counter Threat unit, is is an error-checking algorithm in the software that installed the Hydraq backdoor on compromised PCs. The CRC, or cyclic redundancy check, used a table of only 16 constants, a compact version of the more standard 256-value table.
After searching online, Stewart located only one instance of source code that contained a matching structure that generated the same output from a given input: This paper published in simplified Chinese characters on optimizing CRC algorithms for use in microcontrollers.
"This CRC-16 implementation seems to be virtually unknown outside of China, as shown by a Google search for one of the key variables, 'crc_ta,'" Stewart wrote. "This indicates the Aurora codebase originated with someone who is comfortable reading simplified Chinese. Although source code itself is not restrained by any particular human language or nationality, most programmers reuse code documented in their native language."
Perhaps, but we're not entirely convinced. Stewart readily admits the algorithm is a "clever optimization" that allows the CRC routine to be used in applications where memory is at a premium. If it's that good, it's plausible that attackers not aligned with the People's Republic of China might have heard of it.
What's more, binary code used in Hydraq was either compiled on an English-language system or was edited after the fact to conceal its Chinese-language roots. And Operation Aurora - rather some Chinese codename - came from strings put into the source code to indicate where debug file paths were located.
So for the time being, we'll continue to consider the evidence of Chinese involvement to be circumstantial rather than direct. Either way, Stewart's detective work is impressive. His full report is here. ®
The question one should ask is why is this happening?
If i wanted to frame someone then i would also leave clues.
Sounds like a House script, LOL.
This is so stupid as they first state the attack was clever then they say it was Chinese!
If they are so clever then how did they leave this simple clue?
First rule of software engineering, don't reinvent the wheel!
This is another set-up.
Once again this is what they want the public to believe.
Our Governments are really the stupid one's.
Wake the hell up.
One step forwards, two backwards, cool.
PS Looking forwards to the death of the free world.
The Chinese did it!
The internet told me they did, so there!
Paris. The internet told me what she did, too.
The problem with twisting the circumstantial evidence to point away from the Chinese government suffers from the cascading miracle problem. One rare event in a chain common events (steps) may be plausible, but if to get from point A to point B you require multiple rare events (cascading miracles), then you are in a lot of trouble.