Feeds

Russia assigns $16.7m for nuclear spaceships

Better propulsion is 'key problem' for Mars, Moonbases

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The Russian government has assigned funds of 500 million roubles ($16.7m) for the development of a nuclear-powered spacecraft, according to reports. Draft designs are expected to be finalised by 2012.

RIA Novosti reports that 430 million roubles of the space nuke-engine funding has been assigned to the Rosatom state nuclear corporation, and the remaining 70 megaroubles to space agency Roscosmos.

Roscosmos head Anatoly Perminov spoke last year of the need to develop nuclear powered spacecraft, estimating that the full cost of developing such systems would be 17 billion roubles ($580m). This week's announcements have supplied just under three per cent of that sum, explaining why little more than "draft designs" are expected thus far. However other reports have Roscosmos speaking of "tests" in 2015 and "production" beginning in 2018.

Previous reports have quoted Perminov as specifically mentioning "megawatt-class nuclear space power systems" (MCNSPS), which would normally refer to "an appropriate nuclear reactor heat source" generating electrical power aboard a spacecraft by one of several conversion methods (NASA pdf here). However the latest reports speak of nuclear "propulsion", hinting that Russia may seek to explore the use of nuclear heat energy to expel reaction mass directly, rather than to make electricity.

It's also quite possible that Roscosmos will seek to use MCNSPS electric generators to power some kind of plasma or ion rocket, perhaps along the lines of the Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) drive under development for NASA by former shuttle astronaut Dr Franklin Chang Díaz.

Anatoly Koroteyev, president of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics, has already stated that the key technical problem in sending manned missions to the Moon and Mars is the development of new propulsion systems and energy supplies with a high degree of energy-mass efficiency. The chemical rockets used in spacecraft today expel their reaction mass with relatively low energy, making them highly inefficient.

Particularly in the case of round-trip journeys without refuelling at the other end, chemical rocket craft will need to carry so much fuel that they will struggle to deliver any useful payload. They will also be compelled to coast almost the whole way on interplanetary journeys, leading to very long journey times and severe exposure to cosmic radiation for any astronauts or cosmonauts aboard.

Nuclear power has been used aboard spacecraft before, mostly in the form of radioisotope batteries rather than reactors proper. This has usually been for deep space probes travelling far from the sun - hence unable to use solar power - or in secret surveillance satellites needing a lot of energy for their sensors. On those occasions where such use has been made public, there has sometimes been nuclear-technofear-inspired protest. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
GRAV WAVE DRAMA: 'Big Bang echo' may have been grit on the scanner – boffins
Exit Planet Dust on faster-than-light expansion of universe
Mine Bitcoins with PENCIL and PAPER
Forget Sudoku, crunch SHA-256 algos
SpaceX Dragon cargo truck flies 3D printer to ISS: Clawdown in 3, 2...
Craft berths at space station with supplies, experiments, toys
NASA rover Curiosity drills HOLE in MARS 'GOLF COURSE'
Joins 'traffic light' and perfect stony sphere on the Red Planet
'This BITE MARK is a SMOKING GUN': Boffins probe ancient assault
Tooth embedded in thigh bone may tell who pulled the trigger
DOLPHINS SMELL MAGNETS – did we hear that right, boffins?
Xavier's School for Gifted Magnetotaceans
Big dinosaur wowed females with its ENORMOUS HOOTER
That's right, Doris, I've got biggest snout in the prehistoric world
Japanese volcano eruption reportedly leaves 31 people presumed dead
Hopes fade of finding survivors on Mount Ontake
That glass of water you just drank? It was OLDER than the SUN
One MEELLION years older. Some of it anyway
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.