The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Microsoft readies singular fix for first Patch Tuesday of 2010

No update for frosty Windows 7 bug, mind

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Microsoft's first Patch Tuesday of the year looks set to be more famine than feast.

Redmond plans to instead fix just one critical vuln that affects Windows 2000, XP, Vista and Windows 7.

It will also patch the same bug in Windows Server 2003, Server 2008 and 2008 R2, although the security flaw in those products is marked as low by Microsoft.

However, the firm's Jerry Bryant claimed on the company's security blog that the "Exploitability Index" rating for the vuln would not be high, thereby lowering the overall risk.

Bryant also admitted that Microsoft hadn't patched a Denial of Service bug in SMB (Server Message Block), which the company went public about in November 2009.

The security bug in Windows 7 and Windows 2008 R2 makes it possible to lock up affected systems. The crash would happen without a Blue Screen of Death or other visible indication that anything was amiss.

"We are still working on an update for the issue at this time. We are not aware of any active attacks using the exploit code that was made public for this vulnerability and continue to encourage customers to follow the guidance in the advisory which outlines best practices to help protect systems against attacks that originate outside of the enterprise perimeter," he said.

The software giant's light-footed approach to its latest round of updates contrasts with the hefty collection of patches that trundled out of MS Towers and onto the internet in October last year.

Microsoft issued fixes for 34 vulns as well as 13 updates that month in what was a record Patch Tuesday haul.

The vendor's latest security bulletin release is scheduled for Tuesday, 13 January. ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Apples and Oranges

With the MS patches we're talking about a whole OS, including versions going back 9 years.

Are Mozilla supporting versions of their browser going back a decade? Firefox is just a web browser, and they won't even support anything going back as far as one major release.

And this "common stability issue" would that be the same as the browser crashing when it encounters certain code? In which case it would be a security fix.

2
0

Tuesday the 13th...

Is this something to do with the Y2010K bug? Should someone tell Google their calendar is/isn't correct?

Worried of Brussels

0
0

So, Tuesday is the 13th is it?

Nope, definitely not....

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA PRISM snoop-gate: Won't someone think of the children, wails Apple
10,000 things probed, mostly about missing kids, Alzheimer patients, we're told
Flash flaw potentially makes every webcam or laptop a PEEPHOLE
But it's a Google problem - Chrome only, insists Adobe
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
Yahoo! joins! rivals! in! PRISM! data! request! admission!
Keep calm and carry on using American tech firms, folks
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
Speech-to-text drives motorists to distraction
Will talking to you mean I crash into that car up ahead, Siri?
DHS warns of vulns in hospital medical equipment
Has your doctor's anasthesia machine been hacked?
 breaking news
'BadNews is malware' says outfit that found it
Google says code harmless but Lookout says code base is evolving