Feeds

Another Overland Nasdaq delisting threat

Company now not worth enough

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Overland Storage was told by Nasdaq on December 15 that its stock would be delisted because its share value was below Nasdaq's $15m minimum.

Overland shares are currently trading at $2.0, giving the company a market capitalisation of $12.68m. Delisting from Nasdaq would affect Overland's creditworthiness, potentially increasing its costs and ability to raise capital. The company has had a 90-day period to regain compliance with this particular Nasdaq rule, which expired on December 14. Overland filed an appeal against the ruling on December 18. This halts the delisting until the Nasdaq Hearings Panel issues a ruling on the appeal.

The Panel can grant Overland an exception for up to 180 days after the Nasdaq Staff’s initial delisting decision to regain compliance with the relevant Nasdaq Global Market standard. Alternatively, it could transfer listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market, but Overland stock does not currently meet the continued listing requirements for the Nasdaq Capital Market, either.

If Overland's appeal fails then it has a fallback process it could follow, which would involve an appeal to the Nasdaq Listing and Hearings Review Council. This body can grant an exception for up to 360 days after the Nasdaq Staff’s initial delisting decision.

Overland needs to get its share price consistently up above $2.37 for it to regain compliance with the $15m minimum company value rule. It has sidestepped a different Nasdaq rule concerning shares having a minimum value of a dollar by engineering a reverse stock split earlier this month. That tactic did not help with the company's market capitalisation and the company is seeking a longer period in which to demonstrate improved trading. Hopefully, this will see a stronger share price increasing the company's value above the $15m.

If Overland CEO Eric Kelly and his team can trade their way up and out of this Nasdaq trap then that would mark a significant turnaround in the beleaguered company's fortunes. To do this they have to have time and hopefully the appeal panel, seeing the company has a new executive team with a strong focus on the sales and marketing side, will grant the time requested. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
Facebook to let stalkers unearth buried posts with mobe search
Prepare to HAUNT your pal's back catalogue
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.