Official: British telly really is almost all repeats
Traditional viewer grumble made real by digital era
One thing you can say about the rise of digital telly: there are now more repeats shown on British television than at any time since 2003.
In decades gone by, Brits would regularly moan about the number of repeats on the box - "another Christmas, another showing of The Great Escape" - but it's hard to imagine that repeats accounted for nearly half of all broadcasts.
But, according to Ofcom figures released today, that was the case in 2008.
Incidentally, we should thank, first, the UK's telecommunications and broadcasting regulator for finally putting out numbers that are almost a year out of date, a fact that many a news story today about Britain's digital viewing habits has cheerfully ignored.
Surely, Ofcom, you could have waited just a few weeks and included up-to-date numbers from 2009 too? Eleven months is a long time in the digital revolution, and past trends may easily have been bucked.
It's hard to see a change in the growing proportion of repeats being shown, though. Ofcom's numbers show a steady rise in the percentage of old programmes being given a fresh airing over the years, from 34.5 per cent in 2003 to 44.8 per cent in 2008.
At this rate, it won't be long before British telly really will consist mostly of repeats.
Over the same period, the transmission of new, home-made shows has fallen from 58.8 per cent to 50.1 per cent.
Overseas acquisitions have fallen, from 6.7 per cent in 2003 to 4.7 per cent on 2008, though this comes after peaking at 7.8 per cent in 2006.
So we're not being shown nothing but US cop shows, despite what some bar-room pundits may say.
In fact, we're shown the least amount bought-in material of any country in Europe. Ireland tops the chart with more than 30 per cent of programmes there originating outside the country.
Still, we're not being fed a full diet of repeats just yet. Sweden is closest, with re-broadcasted material accounting for 52.1 per cent of the total output. Italy does best: there, repeats account for only 22.3 per cent of broadcast output - or did in 2008. ®
You dont need a VCR or PVR anymore.
If you miss anything you dont really need iPlayer or an other those other apps either as it will be repeated the next day/week several times. Shows, movies etc. all go round and round and round.
It is getting very hard to find the golden nugget of a decent quality item worth watching that isnt a repeat.
How many times has The Core/Sahara etc. etc. been on this year?
Missed it? Dont worry it will be on again in an hour!
Even bored with the same silicone slappers on babestation! lol
Can we go back to just having the five channels please? Less is more.
The complaints about TV being "All repeats" were perfectly valid when we only had three terrestrial channels to watch and no satellite or cable, let alone 4od, iPlayer, Watch Again etc.
Now we have +1 channels, BBC 3, More4, Sky 2 and 3, Dave, Alibi, Watch, Yesterday etc etc yes, we're getting old stuff shown again, but this is *not* to the exclusion of *new* material.
And are all these "repeats" such a bad thing? When Blake's 7 was first broadcast I missed the first two episodes due to my parents insisting I do my homework first (which dates me!) and it was a long while before I could actually see what happened in the beginning. These days I'd just switch to a +1 channel or watch the repeat later in the week on BBC3 or equivalent.
So, really, what's the big deal?
bbc == pants now
i would love to know where all the bbc license fee goes. i know loads goes to bbc radio with overpaid tubbies like moyles getting far too much for a couple of hours speaking in the morning.
plus, no decent movies, no decent sport, not much comedy (buzzcocks, mock the week & frankie howard being the only 3 i can think of)
the only thing they excel at is nature - but i could buy all the stuff i watch on blu-ray for less than 150/year!
bbc breakfast is just a platform to talk about celebrity fucking dancing.
YET they think they deserve ~£150/year!