Feeds

FTC whacks Intel with anticompetition complaint

Claims Intel coerced vendors, rigged compilers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Updated The US Federal Trade Commission ruined Intel's Christmas by hitting the firm with wide ranging charges of anticompetitive business practices.

The Feds also charge that Intel rigged its compilers to put AMD at a disadvantage and that it is trying to smother its rivals in the graphics chip business.

Intel has rejected the charges as "misguided", "last minute" and not based on investigation by the FTC.

In its statement announcing its complaint, the FTC claims Intel "has illegally used its dominant market position for a decade to stifle competition and strengthen its monopoly."

Intel is accused of locking AMD out of key vendors by using "threats and rewards... to coerce them not to buy rival computer CPU chips."

It adds, "Intel also used this practice, known as exclusive or restrictive dealing, to prevent computer makers from marketing any machines with non-Intel computer chips."

These charges have already been played out in the EU's long-running investigation into Intel, which saw the chip firm stuck with a $1bn fine.

But the FTC stirs things up by alleging that "Intel secretly redesigned key software, known as a compiler, in a way that deliberately stunted the performance of competitors’ CPU chips"

"Intel told its customers and the public that software performed better on Intel CPUs than on competitors’ CPUs," the FTC continues, "but the company deceived them by failing to disclose that these differences were due largely or entirely to Intel’s compiler design."

And to bring its case right up to date, the Feds charge that after using the above practices to lock AMD out of the market until it could catch up, Intel now finds itself falling behind in the graphics market.

"These products have lessened the need for CPUs, and therefore pose a threat to Intel’s monopoly power," the Feds say.

"Intel has responded to this competitive challenge by embarking on a similar anticompetitive strategy, which aims to preserve its CPU monopoly by smothering potential competition from GPU chips such as those made by Nvidia," the FTC complaint charges.

The FTC's charges come hard on the heels of New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's November law suit accusing Intel of "an illegal campaign to deprive AMD of distribution channels."

Intel described the FTC's case as "misguided" and "based largely on claims that the FTC added at the last minute and has not investigated."

The chip makers said the complaint was "explicitly not based on existing law but is instead intended to make new rules for regulating business conduct."

According to Intel, "These new rules would harm consumers by reducing innovation and raising prices."

Intel and the FTC had been in settlement talks, the firm added, but these "stalled when the FTC insisted on unprecedented remedies - including the restrictions on lawful price competition and enforcement of intellectual property rights set forth in the complaint - that would make it impossible for Intel to conduct business."

At least Intel will only be fighting on one front this time. It struck a settlement with AMD to bring the EU's rather similar probe into its business practices to an end last month. However, it remains to be seen whether the FTC's compiler and GPU charges spark new probes on the other side of Atlantic. ®

This story was updated after its original posting to include information from Intel's comments on the FTC's allegations

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
Astro-boffins start opening universe simulation data
Got a supercomputer? Want to simulate a universe? Here you go
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The Heartbleed Bug: how to protect your business with Symantec
What happens when the next Heartbleed (or worse) comes along, and what can you do to weather another chapter in an all-too-familiar string of debilitating attacks?