Axeman Chancellor toes the line on ID cards
Just do it, Darling
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Alistair Darling is making a habit of taking an axe to the projects of his ministerial colleagues in media interviews, if this weekend's press is to be believed.
Last week he forced health secretary Andy Burnham to give an emergency statement in the Commons by waxing confusedly lyrical on the Andrew Marr Show about how the NHS National Programme for IT, or parts of it, or something, wasn't necessary and would be scrapped. It turned out that savings of £600m - less than 5 per cent of the total budget - are planned.
Now the Chancellor has given an interview to the Telegraph. This post-pre-Budget report report, as it were, has again prompted suggestions that a massive government IT programme will be binned.
Selected remarks from the interview were dressed up for the news story, "Alistair Darling signals death of ID cards".
Except he didn't really. He in fact stuck to the current government line that compulsory ID cards are unnecessary, because we'll all have biometric passports anyway.
"Most of the expenditure is on biometric passports which you and I are going to require shortly to get into the US. Do we need to go further than that? Well, probably not."
The interviewer interpreted this as a policy announcement by Darling, perhaps understandable given his newsworthy mutterings over the NPfIT. "He does seem, however, to sound the death knell for ID cards," she wrote.
By the time the story had been copied for Saturday's Times, however, that interpretation had magically teleported from the world of reasonable journalistic speculation and into the mouth of the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
The Times wrote: "Darling went on to say that while his decision was not going against any existing plans, he acknowledged that his intervention would probably sound the death knell for ID cards."
No, he didn't. His comments are easily within the bounds of the non-compulsory U-turn policy shift executed by Home Secretary Alan Johnson in June. There will be no sheepish explanation to the Commons this time. There might be in the Times newsroom.
But, of course, even if Darling had made an announcement on ID cards, these days it would probably be completely academic. The Tories are pledged to scrap the scheme, and the accompanying National Identity Register, if they win the election. ®
COMMENTS
No choice for the masses
You know, I really don't want biometric passports, and if the USoA doesn't want to let me in without one I'm quite unaffected; I have decided long ago, well before biometric passports became the fashion, to stay well out of xenophobia central. There's plenty of rest of the world left and most of it is more sensible to boot. I'd like the government to, like the Swiss government does, respect its citizens' choice and offer both biometric and privacy-respecting versions of the government service called a passport. Especially since the latter isn't vulnerable to rfid cloning, weak key algorithms, and other electronic attack vectors. I'd like the government to be a modicum trustable. Yes I know. *sigh*
Cost savings?
Even better. We just make a policy decision not to go to the US. We can save the cost of biometrics in toto and the only thing that takes a hit is the US tourism industry.
I can't see a downside here.
Not compulsory?
Do people still buy this bull-crap? ID cards, when they come in, will be 100% compulsory and always have been; no matter what any MP or mandarin may say.
If you are too hard of thinking to understand why a "voluntary" card is compulsory, I'll type this slowly.
1) it's not the card, it's the database.
2) As cards will be accepted as "strong" ID, banks and other institutions will get twitchy if you don't have one.
3) Bureaucracy will "streamline" around the card and life will become difficult/hell if you don't have one.
Ergo - they are compulsory.
Of course, we don't need these cards and we have never needed these cards. All they will do is foster a counter-culture designed to protect our privacy. And good luck to them! The people of Britain now need to protect themselves from their own government (never mind the unelected asshats in Brussels).
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
