Feeds

TechCruncher sues former pad partner

Legal JooJoo juju

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The ongoing saga of the CrunchPad JooJoo couch-potato media pad took another sharp turn Thursday when TechCrunch blogmeister, beer-can recycler, and self-reported CrunchPad JooJoo papa Michael Arrington filed suit against his former partners at Fusion Garage.

As a Friday blog post by Arrington makes clear, he remains as "ripshit mad" as he was when news of the then-CrunchPad's supposed launch date was leaked to Singapore's Straits Times in July.

The lawsuit comes on the heels of news late last month that the alleged CrunchPad had allegedly died an alleged death at the hands of Fusion Garage - only to be revived by the Garage band as the JooJoo.

When announcing the demise of the CrunchPad, Arrington said: "We will almost certainly be filing multiple lawsuits against Fusion Garage."

And now one of those possible multiples has been filed in US District Court in Northern California. In the highly detailed and profusely exhibit-laden filing, Arrington accuses Fusion Garage of all sorts of nastiness, including breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of business ideas, fraud, deceit, and unfair competition.

After stating that TechCrunch "holds an esteemed position in the technology world" and informing the court that "TIME magazine named [Arrington] one of the '100 most influential people in the world' in 2008," the suit goes on to cite "Fusion Garage's financial straits," describe how Fusion Garage's founder Chandrasekar Rathakrishnan "tried to wheedle a better deal" in merger talks, and how TechCrunch was "frustrated with delays and communication problems" with Fusion Garage.

"From the very start of their joint venture," the court filing reads, "Fusion Garage engaged in serial misrepresentations to TechCrunch" and that those misrepresentations continued "even while Fusion Garage implemented its plan to steal the CrunchPad from under TechCrunch's nose."

The suit was filed on Thursday afternoon, and on Friday Arrington took the gloves off in his blog post, indulging himself in a bit of borderline-intemperate huffing and puffing.

Arrington (or one of his allies) also vented at his former child, the CrunchPad JooJoo. A comment - which has since been deleted - on Rathakrishnan's CrunchBase profile referred to the Singaporean entrepreneur's involvement with the "soon-to-be failure of a tablet named the JooJoo."

Arrington apparently calmed down enough to see that prediction deleted, but the lawsuit lives on. You can read the full text of it here. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.