Feeds

Anti-spammers urged to gang up

Test suggests collaboration is the way to fight the wrong'uns

SANS - Survey on application security programs

The combined efforts of anti-spam products outperform any individual products alone, according to an experiment by Virus Bulletin, the independent security certification organisation.

In a comparative test, almost 200,000 sample emails were sent to 14 different anti-spam products that were required to filter out spam messages from legitimate smails (ham). The test found that no legitimate mail was blocked by more than four products.

The tests gave VB's anti-spam team the idea of a hypothetical spam filter that marked email as spam if at least five of the 14 products evaluated marked it as dodgy. Such a hypothetical filter would achieve a capture rate of 99.89 per cent and, better still, no false positives.

"For end-users this means that if spam filtering is business-critical, the use of more than one spam filter may be a good option," said VB's anti-spam test director, Martijn Grooten. "The anti-spam industry, meanwhile, should consider the benefits of collaboration and information sharing - and might be better able to protect our inboxes as a result."

The argument recalls the business case of firms such as GFI that have sold products that run two or more anti-virus engines in parallel to detect security threats against mail servers and the like. Running multiple products together makes up for the deficiencies of any single product providing, of course, the components lack similar shortcomings.

Security as a service firms, such as MessageLabs, run multiple spam and anti-virus filtering techniques to weed out junk or dangerous messages from email feeds. Grooten told El Reg he wasn't advocating any particular approach to spam filtering so much as encouraging more information sharing among anti-spam firms, which he reckons lags behind the sample sharing and collaboration commonplace among anti-malware researchers.

"Every spam filter uses multiple techniques but their effectiveness could be further improved if vendors share information on the latest spam attacks between each other more efficiently," Grooten explained.

The bimonthly VBSpam tests use Virus Bulletin's live email feed as well as a spam messages provided by Project Honey Pot. Each tested product is exposed to the same email stream.

More about the methodology (and the results) of the latest VBSpam tests can be found here. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Obama allows NSA to exploit 0-days: report
If the spooks say they need it, they get it
Samsung Galaxy S5 fingerprint scanner hacked in just 4 DAYS
Sammy's newbie cooked slower than iPhone, also costs more to build
Putin tells Snowden: Russia conducts no US-style mass surveillance
Gov't is too broke for that, Russian prez says
Snowden-inspired crypto-email service Lavaboom launches
German service pays tribute to Lavabit
Mounties always get their man: Heartbleed 'hacker', 19, CUFFED
Canadian teen accused of raiding tax computers using OpenSSL bug
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Call of Duty 'fragged using OpenSSL's Heartbleed exploit'
So it begins ... or maybe not, says one analyst
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.